On last.fm: Exclusive interview with Phoenix
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 21 of 72:
Next »
« Previous
This doesn't help Microsoft in China, not at all!
From: [url=http://www.shanghaidaily.com/art/2005/12/24/231001/Microsoft__Google_settle_ex_exec__039_s_job_contract.htm]Microsoft, Google settle ex-exec's job contract[/url]

Microsoft needs more revenue from China to revive global sales growth, which the company has said dipped to a record low 8 percent in the year ended on June 30.

Legal evaluation of it (by a lawyer) was as follows:

"I suspect Microsoft believed it had a pretty good chance of getting the entire year of the non-compete enforced by the judge in Seattle," said Anthony Oncidi, an employment lawyer at Proskauer Rose in Los Angeles who isn't involved in the dispute. "I'm speculating that Microsoft started the negotiation by saying they wanted Lee not to work for the remaining seven months of his agreement."

Dr. Lee is working now and the delay is not going to happen, so Microsoft did not get what they wanted.

What Microsoft won was as follows:

a temporary ruling enforcing an employment contract signed by Lee that barred him from working on some technical projects at competitors.

Dr. Lee is now working for Google, so much for a win by Microsoft! They are both trying to get business going in China, a major growing market!

If Microsoft had actually won anything significant, Dr. Lee would not be working for another 5 months, he is working now (at Google) and the 1 year "non-compete" clause is not applicable if he is not working on the same thing as he was at Microsoft, reports from Google and Microsoft indicate that he is recruiting people for Google which does not violate the non-compete clause.

From: [url= http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000087&sid=aw1ATzSoc3wM&refer=top_world_news]Google, Microsoft Settle Dispute Over Kai-Fu Lee[/url] Dec. 22 (Bloomberg)

Microsoft had won a ruling in Washington state court barring Lee from working on some technical projects at Google.

This means that he can do recruiting, what Google is paying him for (though not from Microsoft). He is the second defection from Microsoft to Google in recent news.
Posted by: B.O.F.H.   Posted on: 12/23/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Google in dire straits...  Mike Cox | 12/22/05
Lukewarm 7  DangDaCommonCentz | 12/23/05
If Google's in  AMarking | 12/23/05
Not sure what happened to my last post  AMarking | 12/23/05
Get to work Mike  jimk_z | 12/24/05
What planet are you living on?  mwiley_z | 12/27/05
It took a while  shallow_diver | 12/27/05
Importantly  Richard Flude | 12/22/05
answer none  zzz1234567890 | 12/23/05
I would say that the Microsoft position is more precarious than Google's  DonnieBoy | 12/23/05
No. Google is dependent on ads...  John Zern | 12/23/05
Man you are dense  BFD | 12/23/05
Clearly Google didn't want this trial to be public.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/23/05
Hiring a defector from the evil empire is NOT evil. Actually, Google is  DonnieBoy | 12/23/05
Yes, Google hires scum of the earth.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/23/05
That's not a nice thing to say about Microsoft Employees.  B.O.F.H. | 12/26/05
That's not a nice thing to say about Microsoft Executives.  B.O.F.H. | 12/26/05
The word you're looking for is "need"  IT_User | 12/23/05
Microsoft offered the settlement, not Google.  B.O.F.H. | 12/23/05
Buwahahaha, give us what he court said and we let you off.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/23/05
This doesn't help Microsoft in China, not at all!  B.O.F.H. | 12/23/05
This doesn't help Microsoft in China, not at all!  B.O.F.H. | 12/23/05
Clearly, Microsoft did not want any more publicity about the best and  DonnieBoy | 12/23/05
No, Microsoft brought the suit. They knew Google would fold.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/23/05
So what happened???  IT_User | 12/23/05
Basically MS realized they had nothing to gain by continuing the case.  DonnieBoy | 12/23/05
Wrong, thjey had everything to gain, and nothing to lose.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/23/05
Saving somebody from the evil empire is NOT evil  DonnieBoy | 12/23/05
Dude, lay off the drugs...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/23/05
Helping a guy that did not want to work at MS is an act of kindness.  DonnieBoy | 12/23/05
Google tried to get the case moved, lost, an knew  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/23/05
So if MS had so much to gain, why did the settle???  DonnieBoy | 12/23/05
It's obvious why this came about  John Zern | 12/23/05
Because MS got money, and taught Google a lesson.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/23/05
No, they tought the world that MS is not a good place to work.  DonnieBoy | 12/23/05
Google folded??? Sounds like Google won this round. Lee can continue  DonnieBoy | 12/23/05
Yes, Google got the scum...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/23/05
So if the guy is scum, why sue in the first place. They should be glad he  DonnieBoy | 12/23/05
They were glad, and glad to slap Google around at the same time.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/23/05
MS slapped themselves around. The lawsuite just helped highlight  DonnieBoy | 12/23/05
Point well taken: Rats fleeing a sinking ship ??? (nt)  Plain Logic | 12/26/05
Really Don  Robert Crocker | 12/24/05
Yes. Google folded, (lost)  John Zern | 12/23/05
Looks like Dr. Lee won his case.  B.O.F.H. | 12/23/05
Agree, except for the reason he left..  John Zern | 12/23/05
Perhaps that and Microsoft need to make an example.  B.O.F.H. | 12/23/05
Lee won nothing, but a home for scum...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/23/05
Your perspective does not mesh with released documents.  B.O.F.H. | 12/23/05
Lee got sheltered like Marc Rich but is reachable.  osreinstall | 12/25/05
What goes around comes around  george_ou | 12/26/05
Re: No, Microsoft brought the suit. They knew Google would fold.  none none | 12/23/05
Microsoft should rehire him  Salman Pak | 12/23/05
Wonder if "We'll stop stealing your people" was part of the agreement?  Plain Logic | 12/23/05
Lee was not what you would call a "Top Exec"  John Zern | 12/23/05
Will this stem the "Rats fleeing the sinking ship" syndrome ???  Plain Logic | 12/23/05
Ex Microsoft Employees  Yensi717 | 12/23/05
THAT was the most logical statement  John Zern | 12/23/05
I agree!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/23/05
The guy must have been at least somewhat good, or . . .  Plain Logic | 12/23/05
The problem is NOT the average programmer at Microsoft.  DonnieBoy | 12/23/05
Another point, you put them to work on something exciting, they are much  DonnieBoy | 12/23/05
Yensi, Who said "all MS programmers are horrible" ???  Plain Logic | 12/23/05
Well, the ship won't sink, but it sure does STINK.  DonnieBoy | 12/23/05
Bad news for Microsoft's employee-slaves  interlocutor | 12/23/05
Stupid employees should not take the job then.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/23/05
It is not that simple...  interlocutor | 12/23/05
Employment is at will, it does not give up certain rights.  B.O.F.H. | 12/23/05
Million dollar bonuses for a 'slave'?  george_ou | 12/25/05
Message has been deleted.  george_ou | 12/25/05
MS in dire straits ....  michael_t | 12/23/05
I thought you didn't call people names  Robert Crocker | 12/24/05
um...  Jack-Booted EULA | 12/26/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here