P2P battle brews in D.C.

TalkBack 13 of 32:

Next »

« Previous

• Thread View
• Flat View

What They Are Not Doing

For now passing legislation isn't going to do a lot of sniff editing. What will be the holdout is going to be the stuff that comes about with PCI-X,Longhorn,4Ghz computers w Gigabyte speeds. This is one of those soft sets - just to show these politicians are doing 'anything at all within their repective duties for U.S. government.

The basic precept is the idea that 'content secure,and security of person are different things. There is the overbearing association that a 'networked computer is something that suggests a 'legal monitor is present. However and whatever the premises of corporation/institution endeavors surmise for security - there is a difference between a 'private computer,and one of wich these entities will base their 'security.

Given the fact the idea of 'security of papers and documents' isnt going to be fathomed ''from an entity, these entities are not also going to do any work subjectively defining what comes from the different aspect of security,of wich security in person is only a premise.

What DRM does in fact is an experiment to vacate that premise via control of the personal security by first assuming as well their is none,and no person is present on the 'instance of 'communication vrs 'network delegations of definition(s),and do so through liscencing.

DMCA,nor Copyright law states that a purchaser of any product must agree to any kind of contract in order to utilize products.Neither is a description of person ,in the use of copyrighted materials,or secured materials described. The electronic features,or relationship to product as well are not prohibitive of anykind of function an electronic copyrighted media can have. In short DMCA,or Copyright law does not give authors the rights,or prescribe law of wich participants of purchasers of copyrighted materials must by law agree to. Both these merely describe the relationship to authors,and the authority to do so.

Products should compete on the basis of 'use of them though 'feature of a product. When persons cannot use copyrighted materials comulative within their means of doing so,doing so without mention of LAWFUL intention, or RELATIONSHIP to author or publisher.This is not the intention of DMCA or Copyright law.Because as well Copyright Law does not grant any relationship,no contract,or legal usury to these effects to a purchaser of a PRODUCT.

When you grant that is is at the loss of security of person in the use of a copyrighted material, this is not the relationship of wich the copyright law,or DMCA has exhibited itself.The relationship of 'persons using copyrighted materials,and authors,or security of them is what the DMCA has said.

There is no provision that describes the loss of the 'security of person THAT IS REQUIRED by description of those laws. And when this is a consideration the 'liscencing conglomerates are operating within a 'BUSINESS LAW. They are not operating within copyright law,nor DMCA to have created a relationship to a person of use.

When these ideas :
security of content,and security of person are better welcomed as an object of competitive persuasion. Then will the notice of courteous application for security be told.

With the advent of 'securing computers, a lot of government taxpayer dollars have gone to the generalize title of 'security. If the government is spending money developing applications that 'secure content, at the loss of ''security of person and still do so with willful inclusion to do so, they can be held accountable.

DMCA,nor copyright law does not explicitly make any reference to a prohibition that:

copyrighted materials cannot:

be copied
communicated
shared
performed
stored
moved device to device

When this is a value attributed to them as a product. Performing these attributes as a 'liscence,at the loss of security or gaining contract by 'aquired authorization by use is something that is not described through copyright law. Products can compete with these values,and the piracy premise does not have to be the prevailing criteria for desiring to have them 'featured.


Copyright law should be amended within the institutional inset:

-rational fair use to the person of use for the asthetic performance of the copyrighted work.


Well if you have questions about this.You would not be asking the hardware distributers.Or the software distributers,medias,or publishers about this.

And you would recognize this the difference in effect :
content security,from security of person.

For now,it is just as easily noted that is an observation of 'PRODUCTS. And that these products are not candor to 'liscence from use of either DMCA,nor Copyright law.

Especially when,to make light of fact,the competitive relationship is described beyond the piracy premise to move into the relationship of the 'performance of a product.

For now,this descreprency is using these falicit relationships,and should be known they are different.So that when the game is then played to 'let the industry decide,it will still be known that that industry is something better than 'usery by liscence can expect for products that perform to the security of person ,and perform well.

But nobodies listening. Because they cannot hear.

Security of content,security of person.Two different things.Consider those first before exploiting government functions wich survive themselves.And nobody else.

Faster machines mean better needed security.So WHAT are you going to do about it ?

-just talking.

Posted by: ParadigmOdyssey   Posted on: 10/20/03 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

• The True Costs of Virtual Server Solutions VMware In an economic environment that is repeatedly heralding the message "do ... Download Now
• Three Steps You Need to Know to Stop Data Loss Varonis Sensitive data exposed to misuse or loss... it is the stuff of nightmares ... Download Now
• Building the Virtualized Enterprise with VMware Iinfrastructure VMware VMware virtualization software has been adopted by over 120,000 enterprise ... Download Now