On MovieTome: The 10 worst movies of 2009 so far!
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 24 of 42:
Next »
« Previous
By the way
thats rpmeyers1....

I realize you where speaking 'out there,while not exactly replying to me.

A solicitation does not cease to be a solicitation simply on a basis of a consent to recieve them.

Perhaps your trying to portray,the good guys (items you want),from the bad guys (strangers in your email box)...

Even the good guys are things you dont want.And being a recipient I would not be telling them they are 'bad guys now.From do not solicit.

Same reflection different mirrors....that was YOU.

Do not solicit does not reflect the rights of the sender of email.It reflects the rights of the recipient to do so unhindered,without or otherwise arranged by the sender.

A CONTROLLING factor far from indemnifying,or criminalizing in order to again ENFORCE either/or of the two.

I simply submit the courtesy.


-just talking.Happy Holidays.
Posted by: ParadigmOdyssey   Posted on: 12/19/03 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

But how do you stop "lawful" Spam  el1jones | 12/17/03
Even worse...  RestonTechAlec | 12/18/03
Get a mass email program to do mass-opt-out  hadaso | 01/08/04
That's why OPT-IN is the only reasonable solution  shawkins | 12/22/03
or a federal opt out plan like with telco's  JWatson77 | 12/28/03
Boy, I wish I had an assistant to do that...  Albee_Freeoneday | 01/08/04
Another Thought  Doug@... | 12/17/03
We want opt-in, and the right to personally prosecute!  rbrucecarter | 12/17/03
Hurts more than it Helps  issthatso | 12/17/03
More realistically....  DarbyOhara | 12/17/03
What ISPs can do  RestonTechAlec | 12/18/03
The real answer!  ShadeTree | 12/17/03
Unfortunately  James T. Kirk | 12/17/03
Burden of proof  Robert Carnegie | 12/17/03
This bill is nothing but a farce ...  worknman | 12/17/03
Do Not Solicit  ParadigmOdyssey | 12/17/03
I do not understand what you wrote  Robert Carnegie | 12/18/03
(NT) Nobody does. Just let it go.  James T. Kirk | 12/18/03
Maybe  ParadigmOdyssey | 12/18/03
Almost cut and paste  rpmyers1 | 12/19/03
yeah I get that  ParadigmOdyssey | 12/19/03
Something's wrong - I'm understanding you  Robert Carnegie | 12/22/03
The bigger  ParadigmOdyssey | 12/22/03
By the way  ParadigmOdyssey | 12/19/03
Is there anything in this bill to prevent the optout list  Taz_z | 12/17/03
This is why we need new representation  Lonewolf_z | 12/17/03
What ever happened to "Opt IN"  Sick Of It | 12/17/03
I do not understand what you wrote  Robert Carnegie | 12/18/03
Congress is no help: they sold out to the DMA!  jdoe512 | 12/18/03
Can Spam Act  mcwebber | 12/22/03
Spammer anti-defamation league, line #1  rpmyers1 | 12/22/03
I would like to press charges  JWatson77 | 12/28/03
lets create a bunch of CAN laws  JWatson77 | 12/28/03
It must go further  cmh510@... | 01/03/04
Focus is wrong: Dry up the cash flow, instead  escoles@... | 01/05/04
spam  deanp60@... | 01/08/04
can spam bill is political scam  ironfist03 | 01/08/04
Everyone should respond to all spam offers!  hapticz | 01/08/04
let's can ignorant politicians!  awilson_z | 01/08/04
How to report spam to the sender's ISP - no technical abilities needed!  hadaso | 01/08/04
How to report spam to the sender's ISP - no technical abilities needed!  hadaso | 01/08/04
Stopping Spam  chris@... | 01/08/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads