On last.fm: Michael Jackson radio - Listen now!
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 7:
Next »
Why bother with a new standard?
What Intel needs to do is use the pre-existing motherboard form factors like Micro-ATX and Mini-ITX. Why can't they just design a board in the Mini-ITX form factor for a single-socket Xeon 3400-series processor with ECC RAM and dual-GBe ports with the standard fare of USB, serial, and onboard VGA to round it out? Integrators can use a number of Mini-ITX cases on the market that support multiple 3.5" or 2.5" hard drives. For the small form factor market, the don't need to have extremely high-end drive options like SAS. I'd say 4-5 SATA ports would suffice. Integrators could use enterprise-class SATA drives to save on cost over the more expensive SAS.
Posted by: Joe_Raby   Posted on: 10/30/09 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Why bother with a new standard?  Joe_Raby | 10/30/09
I think HP was in on defining this standard...  BillDem | 10/30/09
ATX and ITX are PC mobo layouts that don't support servers' needs  de-void | 10/30/09
A blade server "standard"?  Uber Dweeb | 10/30/09
RE: Intel seeks new 'microserver' standard  AdeOghert | 10/31/09
RE: Intel seeks new 'microserver' standard  chromeronin | 10/31/09
Atom.  magallanes | 11/03/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here