On last.fm: Taylor Swift photos and free music!
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 9 of 50:
Next »
« Previous
Confusing...
Well, of course I don't know how it's all going to work out. I haven't played it or anything. But let me see if I can address your points one by one...

"So You can authenticate the game without needing to identify every time you start a game. Authenticating once is enough, so i don't think this measure is only for fight against piracy."

I'm betting you will not have to connect to battle.net each time you want to play single player. I don't know though. Games that use Windows Live log you in for single player, but I don't know if Starcraft 2/Diablo 3 will do that. With that being said, your CD-KEY will need to authenticate against the server each time you want to play multiplayer. This is because one-time client-side verification is not strong enough. A malicious user could mess with that.

"But even when a hosted game is managed by a personal server, you can't bet sure that the packages will not go through the gateway (WAN)"

Are you referring to a personal, hypothetical server? In a hypothetical LAN game, you can be sure that your packets are not going out to the gateway because they're routed with internal IPs. Perhaps I'm misunderstanding you.

"For example and depending the configuration of the next, if you host a webpage, lets say with a real ip as :200.20.30.1 => www.mypage.com, then you locally (and even in the same server) can't ping to this address but you can't access to the webpage because its point outside instead of inside,but you can access the page directly locally (such 127.0.0.1 => localhost)."

That's simply incorrect. If you are seeing that behavior somewhere, then it's certainly a configuration issue probably with your firewall. Pings don't always work in general because the server on the other end can refuse to reply.

But, yes, firewalls and proxies and all that will be an issue for users to grapple with in order to connect. UPnP will help. But I'm sure Blizzard support will provide instructions for users on how to configure their firewalls for battle.net and what not.

And after all that, I'm not sure what your point was.
Posted by: Uncle Ebeneezer   Posted on: 07/08/09 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

This will last all of two months  frgough | 07/07/09
That's a novel idea  rarsa | 07/07/09
Why so angry?  tikigawd | 07/07/09
Yes you are right... humm.. nope, you forgot to mention the LAG  magallanes | 07/07/09
lag?  gregg.judge@... | 07/08/09
No, you need to say more  tikigawd | 07/08/09
You missed the point.  Uncle Ebeneezer | 07/08/09
I am not quite sure about it.  magallanes | 07/08/09
Confusing...  Uncle Ebeneezer | 07/08/09
I refuse to drink that Kool-aid  nucrash | 07/09/09
RE: Starcraft II jettisons LAN support  Guzhno | 07/07/09
Agreed  gnesterenko | 07/07/09
AMEN  Species8472 | 07/07/09
Nice change of pace.  Uncle Ebeneezer | 07/08/09
I don't see this as likely  nucrash | 07/09/09
What about the LAN Party hosts  nucrash | 07/09/09
Gaming is evolving out from under you  Uncle Ebeneezer | 07/09/09
Thank you for encouraging sloth.  nucrash | 07/09/09
RE: Starcraft II jettisons LAN support  Socratesfoot | 07/07/09
From Blizzard  gnesterenko | 07/08/09
From LAN Organizers  nucrash | 07/09/09
RE: Starcraft II jettisons LAN support  raistlin64 | 07/07/09
RE: Starcraft II jettisons LAN support  raistlin64 | 07/07/09
Things could change  Uncle Ebeneezer | 07/08/09
Good to see Blizzard let out the drones.  nucrash | 07/09/09
You found me out...  Uncle Ebeneezer | 07/09/09
We can't afford that  nucrash | 07/09/09
RE: Starcraft II jettisons LAN support  FrioMuerte | 07/07/09
1  gnesterenko | 07/08/09
Pay attention to History  nucrash | 07/09/09
monthly fee for BNET 2  _Lobo_ | 07/08/09
?  gregg.judge@... | 07/08/09
Sure  gnesterenko | 07/08/09
Wrong.  Uncle Ebeneezer | 07/08/09
Angry? mostly amused  rarsa | 07/08/09
Welcome to 2009  gnesterenko | 07/08/09
Meanwhile...  nucrash | 07/09/09
The idea is to reduce piracy, not eliminate  Uncle Ebeneezer | 07/08/09
This worked out well for StarDock  nucrash | 07/09/09
RE: Starcraft II jettisons LAN support  mindhammer | 07/09/09
Give us something new  Uncle Ebeneezer | 07/09/09
Oh you didn't pull the Terrorist Argument  nucrash | 07/09/09
I thought my point was quite clear  Uncle Ebeneezer | 07/09/09
Let's see what happens  nucrash | 07/09/09
RE: Starcraft II jettisons LAN support  jakestonet | 07/09/09
Ditto  nucrash | 07/09/09
Boycott? Yeah, right...  reverand1297 | 07/09/09
So be it  nucrash | 07/09/09
I respect that...  Uncle Ebeneezer | 07/10/09
Atlas Shrugged  nucrash | 07/10/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here