Intel urges SMEs: Don't delay PC refresh

TalkBack 8 of 28:

Next »

« Previous

• Thread View
• Flat View

True, but unfair and limited

Execs have for more important, time consuming, and financially important to the company then saving $50-$150 a year per machine, especially if youare talking about companies with less then 20 employees. Sure they'll eat this up, because they are presented with limited information and unless they have someone to tell them otherwise, they won't waste their time researching every little thing that comes across their desk. Nothing would get done if that were the case. It's not a perfect situation, but its the lesser of two evils.

"The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed."

Posted by: gnesterenko   Posted on: 06/29/09 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

• The True Costs of Virtual Server Solutions VMware In an economic environment that is repeatedly heralding the message "do ... Download Now
• Three Steps You Need to Know to Stop Data Loss Varonis Sensitive data exposed to misuse or loss... it is the stuff of nightmares ... Download Now
• Reducing Server Total Cost of Ownership with VMware Virtualization Software VMware VMware virtualization enables customers to reduce their server TCO and ... Download Now