On BNET: Give your browser a panic button
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 6 of 10:
Next »
« Previous
Negative Publicity
They probably want to avoid negative publicity.
I, like you, watched chromium-browser evolve
from a ticking time-bomb to a stable
environment. I now use it as my full-time
browser safely, and I accept that for Flash,
I'll have to switch to the similarly-light
Midori (DON'T install the Jaunty one: it's
horrendously unstable. Add the newest version
instead, it's perfectly stable) - but I think
the Average Joe that just wants his YouTube
won't like it when Google Chrome refuses to do
it - and that even when it's implemented in the
future, he'll remember that time it didn't work.

I do miss the daily updates, though. It was
pretty, watching Chromium evolve: Step by step,
it gained a basic GUI, then tabs and such.. It
stopped crashing on Javascript so often, and
slowly but surely developed into an almost fully
functional (Flash excepted) browser. About a
month ago, it stopped crashing on SSE
exceptions, and two weeks ago, it gained the
ability to limit crash-damage to just a single
tab.
Posted by: MetzM   Posted on: 06/06/09 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

A Cross and garlic needed  Alan Smithie | 06/05/09
RE: Google debuts Chrome for Mac, Linux  teddybairs1 | 06/05/09
Here  MetzM | 06/05/09
I just downloaded Chrome to my old Aspire One, and it rocks.  DonnieBoy | 06/05/09
Why are they so squeamish about it?  teddybairs1 | 06/05/09
Negative Publicity  MetzM | 06/06/09
RE: Google debuts Chrome for Mac, Linux  SD_Johnny | 06/06/09
Sorry  MetzM | 06/08/09
Never could get the PPA Ubuntu Chromium daily builds  mhenriday | 06/08/09
It is about time  cyrusvannorman | 06/10/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here