On CHOW: COOKBOOKS make great gifts: TOP 12 books
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 16 of 19:
Next »
« Previous
...mention of Real's countersuit
I'm not seeing how "...the MPAA is illegally working to stamp out all consumer rights..." As noted in the article, the Real product can be used to copy RENTED DVDs. Do you believe that paying a one-time rental fee gives you the right to a permanent copy if you enjoyed the movie?
Posted by: davemcknight   Posted on: 05/19/09 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Here are five reasons  Alan Smithie | 05/18/09
Yes, for profit companies  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/18/09
There is a difference  Alan Smithie | 05/18/09
That why we have Blu-Ray  Randalllind | 05/18/09
"Confident" not "confidant"  riredale | 05/18/09
RE: MPAA vs. Real: Five reasons why Hollywood will win  DannyO_0x98 | 05/18/09
The problem with DVDs these days  Michael Kelly | 05/18/09
Same arguments 321-Studios used, they failed.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/18/09
MPAA could solve it quit easily...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/18/09
Or even a low cost replacement.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/18/09
Re: Or even a low cost replacement.  PottHead | 05/18/09
Let them eat cake....  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/18/09
I'm cool with that  Michael Kelly | 05/18/09
Reason #6  none none | 05/18/09
Completely left out the mention of Real's countersuit  terry flores | 05/18/09
...mention of Real's countersuit  davemcknight | 05/19/09
Classic but invalid argument  terry flores | 05/19/09
I bet that story is biased against backing up DVDs...  Grayson Peddie | 05/18/09
RE: MPAA vs. Real: Five reasons why Hollywood will win  Saiclouk | 05/19/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here