On TechRepublic: 10 lame phrases to cut from your resume
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 4 of 29:
Next »
« Previous
Disconnected networks safe??
while private disconnected networks add to security, really it is not the total answer. It only means that an attacker would require inside help or a different kind of equipment. It is pretty naive to think that technology alone can keep us safe. Some of the breaches go far beyond "remote controlled" hacking.

Blended cyber attacks where there is a combination of remote hackers and physical spies are probably much more penetrating.

Governments, parallel governments and criminals would not abandon old proven methods. they would supplement these methods.

The only way to gain an upper hand is actually to educate and inform more people about security (cyber and otherwise) and to train many more security experts.

If we only knew what goes on? some of us would panic, some would fight and some would organise to handle reality.

It must be very tricky for the FBI, the CIA or the President to decide what to share and what not to share.

There is a point where National Security becomes anti-democratic. It seems to me that we passed that point and we are now being kept scared so that we do not question authority.
Posted by: provincialplace@...   Posted on: 04/23/09 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

This "private initiative" BS has gone too far!  kd5auq | 04/22/09
The problem.....  daMan25 | 04/22/09
Agreement...  Ninja1507 | 04/23/09
Disconnected networks safe??  provincialplace@... | 04/23/09
I love the chineese reponse. My rebuttal would be..  Been_Done_Before | 04/22/09
China owns America...  Christian_<>< | 04/22/09
Kind of true.....  daMan25 | 04/22/09
if only governments were in charge?  provincialplace@... | 04/23/09
good point  dave@... | 04/23/09
Change the game  Boot_Agnostic | 04/22/09
Track down the source of an 'incursion' ...  SpikeyMike | 04/22/09
Shoot a few Spammers too  jgwinner | 04/22/09
what is a spamer?  dave@... | 04/23/09
There is no such thing as a cyber expert  BALTHOR | 04/22/09
Agreed  unholytech | 04/22/09
RE: DoD Gates: We're always under cyberattack  bamsmail@... | 04/22/09
Two words: Gross Incompetence  Marty R. Milette | 04/23/09
Two words: Gross Incompetence  JOHN_TUOHY | 04/23/09
As you say, we may be reciprocating in kind but...  invmgr@... | 04/23/09
Confidence or Overconfidence?  provincialplace@... | 04/23/09
RE: DoD Gates: We're always under cyberattack  rgoetz | 04/23/09
RE: DoD Gates: We're always under cyberattack  rgoetz | 04/23/09
RE: DoD Gates: We're always under cyberattack  carlsonk@... | 04/23/09
RE: DoD Gates: We're always under cyberattack  dbguru99 | 04/23/09
RE: DoD Gates: We're always under cyberattack  dave@... | 04/23/09
duplicate post: please ignore  dave@... | 04/23/09
RE: DoD Gates: We're always under cyberattack  badkid32 | 04/23/09
RE: DoD Gates: We're always under cyberattack  badkid32 | 04/23/09
RE: DoD Gates: We're always under cyberattack  badkid32 | 04/23/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Premier Vendor Content Whitepapers, webcasts & resources from our Power Center Sponsors
advertisement

IT Solutions for 2010

  • Get cost-effective strategies and roadmaps on the most important issues facing IT leaders in 2010! Learn how to easily cut costs and deliver greater efficiency starting with your database, IT compliance management and data center. Visit the IT Leaders Dashboard. Visit the IT Leaders Dashboard.
  • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline