On CBS MoneyWatch: Report: Tiger to Pay Wife $60 Million
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 43 of 65:
Next »
« Previous
Re: 12 Megapixels Enough? For most, yes; but ....
Mr. Watanabe has some very good points, and practically speaking, 12 megapixels is certainly enough to produce excellent photos at the sizes used by most amateur photographers. He's also correct that picture quality is determined by alot of factors, of which the camera's pixel population is just one.

But there are a significant number of advanced amateur photgraphers out there (as well as advanced "wannabes") who will want to make much bigger enlargements of their photos, and for whom the higher pixel populations will always be important in their decisions to purchase particular cameras. A bigger concern, however, is that the purchasing public has a tendency to focus (pardon the pun) on an easily qualtifiable number to distinguish between products of different quality. Just as computer customers have for many years focused on processor speed and hard disk size, photographers will continue to consider the number of megapixels and optical zoom range in digital cameras as a primary factor in their decisions on which to buy.

No doubt there are practical problems in building cameras with ever more pixels, but where problems exist, opportunities abound for creating solutions that work. Where will the Olympus E-series be when "mainstream" cameras have 24 megapixels? Will they even be marketable? Will Olympus be left behind?

Certainly Olympus would do well to help educate the picture-taking public on the many factors that make a camera able to take really good pictures, but Mr. Watanabe would do well to watch where the megapixel race is headed, and be ready and able to market products that are competitive at all levels. I, for one, truly miss the innovation that Olympus brought with their now venerable OM-series film SLRs. So, how about a full-frame 35mm DSLR, Olympus? Something of advanced amateur to professional quality, that would take Olympus OM-series lenses?
Posted by: dcwest   Posted on: 03/09/09 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

I agree  nucrash | 03/06/09
RE: Olympus: 12 megapixels is enough  No More Microsoft Software Ever! | 03/06/09
I agree, but am not optimistic  voyager529 | 03/06/09
How little you know about "good old" 35mm film  Unix Pimp | 03/06/09
My point exactly.  No More Microsoft Software Ever! | 03/06/09
You're right, I've never shot "real photos" on 35mm  voyager529 | 03/06/09
How little you know about film.  Bruizer | 03/09/09
slide film  jpouchet | 03/09/09
Who said anything about negative print film?  Bruizer | 03/09/09
Digital here to stay  mggordon | 03/09/09
My first instinct was right then.  Bruizer | 03/09/09
Kodachrome R.I.P.  raelalt | 07/07/09
never heard of Kodachrome? (nt)  What the ...! | 03/09/09
Show me where to get K24?  Bruizer | 03/09/09
Fujichrome 50D  Geotopia | 05/07/09
E-6 Process  Geotopia | 05/07/09
I was talking about 12 MP APS-C sensors  Unix Pimp | 03/10/09
No you weren't  Bruizer | 03/10/09
who said 12 MP for pros?  kevinrs1 | 04/11/09
Exactly  Etch44 | 05/07/09
Film vs Digital  Prostock | 04/09/09
There's more to quality than resolution  tbcass | 03/09/09
Digression -- Equivalency film vs digital  mggordon | 03/09/09
Just an aside...  readwryt@... | 05/07/09
But remember how you chose a camera  PhilippeV | 04/09/09
re: How little you know about "good old" 35mm film  molumen | 05/07/09
There is another option...  MSFTWorshipper | 03/06/09
You make no sense.  tbcass | 03/09/09
RE: Olympus: 12 megapixels is enough  electricpower | 03/06/09
RE: Olympus: 12 megapixels is enough  nospam@... | 03/06/09
35mm film  dev-null | 07/07/09
I prefer very high quality more than megapixels.  Grayson Peddie | 03/08/09
Greater dynamic range vs. more MP  mmoran@... | 03/09/09
Greater dynamic range: technology exists  pkcyll | 03/09/09
What kind of rig do you currently use?  mmoran@... | 03/09/09
The weakness is display, not taking  mggordon | 03/09/09
re: Greater dynamic range vs. more MP  trm1945 | 04/09/09
RE: Olympus: 12 megapixels is enough  derekgore | 03/09/09
RE: Olympus: 12 megapixels is enough  PeterMG | 03/09/09
its on the user, not on the rig  adelacuesta | 03/09/09
The only problem: FUD sells...  goyta | 03/09/09
RE: Olympus: 12 megapixels is enough  kapauldo | 03/09/09
Re: 12 Megapixels Enough? For most, yes; but ....  dcwest | 03/09/09
RE: Olympus: 12 megapixels is enough  luv2run@... | 03/09/09
RE: Olympus: 12 megapixels is enough  dougsdigs | 03/09/09
Addressed yes, solved no.  mggordon | 03/09/09
Look at CPUs  TriadX1 | 03/09/09
RE: Olympus: 12 megapixels is enough  rdhalsteatzd | 03/09/09
RE: Olympus: 12 megapixels is enough  levine@... | 03/10/09
RE: Olympus: 12 megapixels is enough  ewelch | 04/09/09
RE: Olympus: 12 megapixels is enough  elizasuttn | 04/09/09
Most!  gbentley@... | 04/13/09
RE: Olympus: 12 megapixels is enough  dennis@... | 05/07/09
RE: Olympus: 12 megapixels is enough  dategu | 05/07/09
RE: Olympus: 12 megapixels is enough  phatkat | 05/07/09
RE: Olympus: 12 megapixels is enough  tigerkat1@... | 05/08/09
Sorry Olympus 12 megapixels is NOT enough  kday | 05/10/09
RE: Olympus: 12 megapixels is NOT enough  crawlers | 05/19/09
RE: Olympus: 12 megapixels is enough  crawlers | 05/27/09
Finally someone in the camera industry admits the nonsense...  aharry@... | 07/07/09
RE: Olympus: 12 megapixels is enough  rajashekhar.rao@... | 07/07/09
Compare with music  macgroover | 07/07/09
RE: Olympus: 12 megapixels is enough  rttedrow@... | 07/07/09
Does the camera take the picture?  rushingturtle | 07/07/09
faveon sensors  crawlers | 08/19/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Premier Vendor Content Whitepapers, webcasts & resources from our Power Center Sponsors
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here