On TV.com: WWE ECW latest episode
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 38 of 65:
Next »
« Previous
RE: Olympus: 12 megapixels is enough
Perhaps the point of sensor size and multiple sensors has been overlooked? Talking major market share I agree with the article, the average Joe and Jane Blow "don't need no steenkin'" 12 megapixels or even four!

Working with 12 MP and improving speed on the smaller cameras, by enlarging the sensors or using multiple sensors can be done in the compact cameras. As well s improving anti shake technology and more optical zoom.

But much of the rhetoric here ignores history.

Being older does not mean smarter, but it does grant me the ability to remember back in the day.

The megapixel debate parallels the old film camera market exactly. A majority of the people wanted easy and quick, quality was not a factor per se, as long as the folks in the pic were recognizable. Thus the old 110 instamatics, which served that segment well.

For the instant gratification crowd polaroid had the answer.

For the serious amateur a low end SLR with interchangeable lenses and filters could be had.

The professionals, and the folks with more money to burn and not professional, (The Rolex watch and caddilac crowd) then as now, both groups forked out the big bucks for the exact custom system they needed or wanted.

The same market forces are at work today.

There were a billion more instamatics sold back then than high end camera frames with thousands of dollar lens sets etc.

I'd rather a buck from each of those instamatics, than 20 bucks profit from a thousand high end SLR systems.

Now, with digital cameras, we are all instant gratification oriented. But the market segments remain the same.

The more things change, the more they remain the same. wink
Posted by: derekgore   Posted on: 03/09/09  (Edited: 03/09/2009 @ 09:34) You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

I agree  nucrash | 03/06/09
RE: Olympus: 12 megapixels is enough  No More Microsoft Software Ever! | 03/06/09
I agree, but am not optimistic  voyager529 | 03/06/09
How little you know about "good old" 35mm film  Unix Pimp | 03/06/09
My point exactly.  No More Microsoft Software Ever! | 03/06/09
You're right, I've never shot "real photos" on 35mm  voyager529 | 03/06/09
How little you know about film.  Bruizer | 03/09/09
slide film  jpouchet | 03/09/09
Who said anything about negative print film?  Bruizer | 03/09/09
Digital here to stay  mggordon | 03/09/09
My first instinct was right then.  Bruizer | 03/09/09
Kodachrome R.I.P.  raelalt | 07/07/09
never heard of Kodachrome? (nt)  What the ...! | 03/09/09
Show me where to get K24?  Bruizer | 03/09/09
Fujichrome 50D  Geotopia | 05/07/09
E-6 Process  Geotopia | 05/07/09
I was talking about 12 MP APS-C sensors  Unix Pimp | 03/10/09
No you weren't  Bruizer | 03/10/09
who said 12 MP for pros?  kevinrs1 | 04/11/09
Exactly  Etch44 | 05/07/09
Film vs Digital  Prostock | 04/09/09
There's more to quality than resolution  tbcass | 03/09/09
Digression -- Equivalency film vs digital  mggordon | 03/09/09
Just an aside...  readwryt@... | 05/07/09
But remember how you chose a camera  PhilippeV | 04/09/09
re: How little you know about "good old" 35mm film  molumen | 05/07/09
There is another option...  MSFTWorshipper | 03/06/09
You make no sense.  tbcass | 03/09/09
RE: Olympus: 12 megapixels is enough  electricpower | 03/06/09
RE: Olympus: 12 megapixels is enough  nospam@... | 03/06/09
35mm film  dev-null | 07/07/09
I prefer very high quality more than megapixels.  Grayson Peddie | 03/08/09
Greater dynamic range vs. more MP  mmoran@... | 03/09/09
Greater dynamic range: technology exists  pkcyll | 03/09/09
What kind of rig do you currently use?  mmoran@... | 03/09/09
The weakness is display, not taking  mggordon | 03/09/09
re: Greater dynamic range vs. more MP  trm1945 | 04/09/09
RE: Olympus: 12 megapixels is enough  derekgore | 03/09/09
RE: Olympus: 12 megapixels is enough  PeterMG | 03/09/09
its on the user, not on the rig  adelacuesta | 03/09/09
The only problem: FUD sells...  goyta | 03/09/09
RE: Olympus: 12 megapixels is enough  kapauldo | 03/09/09
Re: 12 Megapixels Enough? For most, yes; but ....  dcwest | 03/09/09
RE: Olympus: 12 megapixels is enough  luv2run@... | 03/09/09
RE: Olympus: 12 megapixels is enough  dougsdigs | 03/09/09
Addressed yes, solved no.  mggordon | 03/09/09
Look at CPUs  TriadX1 | 03/09/09
RE: Olympus: 12 megapixels is enough  rdhalsteatzd | 03/09/09
RE: Olympus: 12 megapixels is enough  levine@... | 03/10/09
RE: Olympus: 12 megapixels is enough  ewelch | 04/09/09
RE: Olympus: 12 megapixels is enough  elizasuttn | 04/09/09
Most!  gbentley@... | 04/13/09
RE: Olympus: 12 megapixels is enough  dennis@... | 05/07/09
RE: Olympus: 12 megapixels is enough  dategu | 05/07/09
RE: Olympus: 12 megapixels is enough  phatkat | 05/07/09
RE: Olympus: 12 megapixels is enough  tigerkat1@... | 05/08/09
Sorry Olympus 12 megapixels is NOT enough  kday | 05/10/09
RE: Olympus: 12 megapixels is NOT enough  crawlers | 05/19/09
RE: Olympus: 12 megapixels is enough  crawlers | 05/27/09
Finally someone in the camera industry admits the nonsense...  aharry@... | 07/07/09
RE: Olympus: 12 megapixels is enough  rajashekhar.rao@... | 07/07/09
Compare with music  macgroover | 07/07/09
RE: Olympus: 12 megapixels is enough  rttedrow@... | 07/07/09
Does the camera take the picture?  rushingturtle | 07/07/09
faveon sensors  crawlers | 08/19/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here