On mySimon: Toys Of The Year Award Winners
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 5 of 16:
Next »
« Previous
They're made for both.
The more powerful machines are made for more powerful applications, not more resource demanding OS.

Or are you advocating a move back to DOS?

If XP does all I need, and I can use the rest of the computation power for actual programs (not the OS), then this is what I'll use.

Why limit it to XP? Why not Windows 3.1? Or DOS?
Posted by: ye   Posted on: 01/08/09  (Edited: 01/08/2009 @ 09:37) You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Hardware requirements  amitbat | 01/08/09
realistically, there arent.  JoeMama_z | 01/08/09
Let this argument die already!  ye | 01/08/09
Let this argument die already!  amitbat | 01/08/09
They're made for both.  ye | 01/08/09
For one, because DOS has no TCP/IP networking  Michael Kelly | 01/08/09
Actually, no  LordLiverpool | 01/09/09
Vista was just a gimick to help vendors sell expensive hardware  Breetai | 01/09/09
DX10  cpt_slog@... | 01/12/09
RE: Microsoft: Windows 7 means business  Loverock Davidson | 01/08/09
Shill Alert!  Metronome49 | 01/08/09
You're a shill! (NT)  Loverock Davidson | 01/08/09
Good comeback  Metronome49 | 01/09/09
If Only Vista was Delivered As Promised  cpt_slog@... | 01/12/09
RE: Microsoft: Windows 7 means business  tomax7 | 01/08/09
I WANT MY SHOW DESKTOP BACK!  Michael Of Atlanta | 01/13/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Premier Vendor Content Whitepapers, webcasts & resources from our Power Center Sponsors
advertisement