On TechRepublic: Worst movie of the year?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 11 of 17:
Next »
« Previous
AMD lifeline
Michael, you seem to forget that "x64" instructions originally were known as "amd64", as AMD created them. Intel's 64-bit chip creation, the Itanium, had a critical flaw: it ran x86 code very slow (even high clock speeds didn't help).

After some time of terrible Itanium sales, Intel wisely saw the errors of their ways and jumped on AMD's ship. Shortly thereafter they again took over server sales from AMD (the first Opteron's blew away Intel offerings, especially in mixed 32/64 bit situations).

So, why give AMD a lifeline? Because of several reasons, one of which being "Intel isn't always right."
Posted by: EMonkIA   Posted on: 01/06/09 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

The inquirer? A joke? No ABM punches pulled by the blogger here.  xuniL_z | 01/05/09
You better check your facts  rarsa | 01/05/09
Are you aware of the history between these two?  SpikeyMike | 01/06/09
Same old and tired line.  xuniL_z | 01/08/09
try to stay on target, would ya ?  User07734 | 01/09/09
I doubt Intel wants to give the market to AMD  GuidingLight | 01/05/09
No one's going to leave Intel just to keep Windows.  T1Oracle | 01/05/09
No one's saying Intel will drop Windows support  Michael Kelly | 01/05/09
Opensource Hardware (low cost)  Maarek | 01/05/09
I wouldn't bet against new low cost hardware development  Michael Kelly | 01/05/09
AMD lifeline  EMonkIA | 01/06/09
eh?  magallanes | 01/06/09
RE: Linux pioneer moves from Red Hat to Intel  Loverock Davidson | 01/05/09
I cannot believe you are for real  rarsa | 01/05/09
Indeed he is!  lemiffe | 01/05/09
You should know  rarsa | 01/05/09
Alan Cox ...  EMonkIA | 01/06/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here