On mySimon: Issey Miyake Automatic Watch for Men
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 9 of 9:
« Previous
RE: Benchmarks: AMD's 45nm 'Shanghai' Opteron
My opinion is that AMD has been a better bang for the buck for the last decade. And perhaps all the intel pushers in the world need to realize that AMD is the only reason intel keeps their prices down. And to add to that, AMD is the only company forcing constant speed improvements. I remember what it was like when intel was the only chip vendor. We seldom got performance increases and chip prices were sky high. I for one will always be buying AMD products when I build pc's due to those facts.
Posted by: kuei   Posted on: 11/27/08 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Yeah, but 1 i7 Nehalem can defeat 2 Shanghai chips  georgeou | 11/24/08
still 4 cores vs 4 cores.. but...  doh123 | 11/25/08
Conclusion, AMD is still behind.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/24/08
Learn to Read.  Bozzer | 11/25/08
To bad it compares old Intel with new AMD  DeWynter | 11/26/08
Maybe you should read the whole article  GoPower | 11/26/08
RE: Benchmarks: AMD's 45nm 'Shanghai' Opteron  bwwiset | 11/26/08
RE: Benchmarks: AMD's 45nm 'Shanghai' Opteron  rollyocampo | 11/26/08
RE: Benchmarks: AMD's 45nm 'Shanghai' Opteron  kuei | 11/27/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement