Really looking forward to an Arm netbook that will go a couple of days on a
DonnieBoy | 11/14/08
|
 
The question isn't Windows
Michael Kelly | 11/14/08
|
Well, iPhone did not support Flash and was a big success, but, I am sure
DonnieBoy | 11/14/08
|
|
The iPhone has a built-in customer base
Michael Kelly | 11/14/08
|
|
Well, I do keep flash block on, and avoid sites with flash. But, this is a
DonnieBoy | 11/14/08
|
|
It's not just a simple recompile
Michael Kelly | 11/14/08
|
|
Arm is 32 bits, so, unless they have some assembly language code (I doubt),
DonnieBoy | 11/14/08
|
|
Netbooks' Primary Function???
john.foggitt@... | 12/04/08
|
|
Adobe Flash clients available for ARM ...
MisterMiester | 11/14/08
|
|
Notice that MS is not even talking about a version for netbooks yet. Arm
DonnieBoy | 11/14/08
|
|
Microsoft is always late to the party
zmud | 11/14/08
|
|
It sounds like Ubuntu does not either
GuidingLight | 11/14/08
|
|
Ubuntu has been working on this for some time. Dell is also using Ubuntu on
DonnieBoy | 11/14/08
|
|
Waste of time
croberts | 11/14/08
|
|
Product returns are not that high overall ...
MisterMiester | 11/14/08
|
|
With Linux and free software, it is not a big deal to have a different chip
DonnieBoy | 11/14/08
|
|
You also forget the purpose of a Netbook, and also how the software we use
DonnieBoy | 11/14/08
|
|
Yes, I agree. I think that Intel will throw a lot of resources at this
DonnieBoy | 11/14/08
|
|
RE: Ubuntu to run on ARM-based netbooks
BobLah | 11/14/08
|
|
Yes, Flash is important, and it is a simple re-compile for 32-bit arm. But,
DonnieBoy | 11/14/08
|
|
When talking about ease of use
AndyCee | 11/17/08
|
|
Already Been Done
notmyname2 | 11/18/08
|
When you transition from your existing Red Hat environment to SUSE Linux Enterprise from Novell, you can recognize dramatic cost savings, perhaps as much 50%
