Schneier slams US border biometrics

TalkBack 21 of 35:

Next »

« Previous

• Thread View
• Flat View

One of us certainly is.

NIST themselves said the jet fuel burned off quickly like in a few minutes. The fuel only served to start the office contents on fire. They also said the jet impacts did not significantly weaken the building. FEMA said fire initiated collapse had only a minuscule likelihood of occurrence. It is crystal clear to anyone that understands Newtonian physics that the WTC tower collapses by fire violates the laws of physics. You can read a peer-reviewed paper about it here:

http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCIEJ/2008/00000002/00000001/35TOCIEJ.SGM

The other referenced papers explain it in more detail.

Posted by: cmatrix   Posted on: 11/13/08 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

• VMware Infrastructure: A Guide to Bottom-Line Benefits VMware Frustrated by the costs of maintain ever larger data centers?or building ... Download Now
• Open Standards Technologies Provide the Ingredients for Delivering Security Across the Papa Gino's Enterprise Dell Papa Gino's Holdings Corporation founded by the entrepreneur operates one ... Download Now
• Building the Virtualized Enterprise with VMware Iinfrastructure VMware VMware virtualization software has been adopted by over 120,000 enterprise ... Download Now