On TechRepublic: Five super-secret features in Windows 7
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 14 of 47:
Next »
« Previous
Level of detail..
Most business requirements aren't beyond the abilities of techies

For software such as Content management, collaboration, document storage, and the like, I would agree with you - as I've stated earlier, there are pretty static business requirements for this type of software, and they can mainly be managed through a database alone.

In the case of ERP, CRM, and SCM software (accounting, distribution, job costing, etc) I would HIGHLY disagree that techies would have the knowledge to develop this type of software any more than the accountants or operations staff who will be using it could. There is too much required knowledge for either camp to be successful.

For this type of software, you need collaboration from many specialists (HIGHLY skilled programmers, Accounting Specialists, Operations Management Specialists, etc) and project management from people that understand the fundamentals of each camp who can manage the communication of requirements from the Accounting/Operations people to the software architects.

Ask any given programmer, for example, what IFRS is, and how it differs from GAAP, and you'll probably get a blank stare, however understanding and applying the difference is crucial for any ERP system that hopes to be used by a publicly traded enterprise where there are legal ramifications to the capabilities of the software.

To their credit I think it is completely within the realm of OSS to create these enterprise level applications. However they lack the leadership for these endeavors.

Fundamentally, yes, we agree that Open Source software lacks this kind of leadership, but it isn't just because of lack of interest. Open Source projects are still generally organized, defined, and run by programmers - little knowledge of complex business requirements. This hurdle needs to be cleared before Open Source can even begin to churn out this type of enterprise software.
Posted by: daftkey   Posted on: 10/20/08 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Red Hat CEO: Vista marks end of 'planned software'  Loverock Davidson | 10/20/08
....  Linux User 147560 | 10/20/08
So does that mean  mdemuth | 10/20/08
And what is in the CEO's best interest?  GuidingLight | 10/20/08
What a crappy argument!!!  jorgebraga | 10/21/08
Closed-source will live on...  nix_hed | 10/20/08
Sure it will  Michael Kelly | 10/20/08
First, Red Hat is probably not the best speaker for Open Source, or is it?  Gruffydd | 10/20/08
As much as  TedKraan | 10/21/08
RE: Red Hat CEO: Vista marks end of 'planned software'  steeleweed@... | 10/20/08
Red Hat Gives Flawed Argument  mikefarinha | 10/20/08
Slight difference  daftkey | 10/20/08
We Agree  mikefarinha | 10/20/08
Level of detail..  daftkey | 10/20/08
woah...  daftkey | 10/20/08
I stand corrected.  mikefarinha | 10/20/08
Hmmm..  TedKraan | 10/21/08
Vista, Kubuntu with KDE 4.1 an excellent set of tools  progon | 10/20/08
Kinda like telling the emperor he has no clothes?  kd5auq | 10/20/08
American Idol vs B.Spears  daftkey | 10/20/08
Exactly!  GeiselS@... | 10/20/08
Good point  daftkey | 10/20/08
This is exactly why  TedKraan | 10/21/08
huh?  aesirloke@... | 10/22/08
If we had a nickel for each proclaimed death knell...  ejhonda | 10/20/08
All commercial software is planned.  peter_erskine@... | 10/20/08
A false assumption..  daftkey | 10/20/08
RE: Red Hat CEO: Vista marks end of 'planned software'  gertruded | 10/20/08
I can't believe  daftkey | 10/20/08
How much do you earn?  GuidingLight | 10/21/08
Holy crap  daftkey | 10/22/08
"Planned Software" probably isn't the right way to put it  John L. Ries | 10/20/08
RE: Red Hat CEO: Vista marks end of 'planned software'  todbran@... | 10/20/08
RE: Red Hat CEO: Vista marks end of 'planned software'  mydasx | 10/20/08
Better Analogy  TedKraan | 10/21/08
How does that work..  daftkey | 10/21/08
more like...  TedKraan | 10/21/08
RE: Red Hat CEO: Vista marks end of 'planned software'  LordLiverpool | 10/21/08
RE: Red Hat CEO: Vista marks end of 'planned software'  mydasx | 10/21/08
I feel IE8 i9s the end of such software; and Red Hat can use my one piece:  rtirman37@... | 10/21/08
Never as good, but always more popular nonetheless.  db3k | 10/21/08
RE: Red Hat CEO: Vista marks end of 'planned software'  jetsethi | 10/21/08
Whitehurst mixes up planning with modularity, turns in to chicken licken.  pixolut | 10/21/08
RE: Red Hat CEO: Vista marks end of 'planned software'  mydasx | 10/24/08
OS shows its lack of planning  ChrisOPeterson | 10/25/08
RE: Red Hat CEO: Vista marks end of 'planned software'  NegativeElectrons | 10/27/08
RE: Red Hat CEO: Vista marks end of 'planned software'  blwy10 | 11/13/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here