On GameFAQs: The top 10 most terrifying PC games
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 5 of 7:
Next »
« Previous
RE: Shuttleworth defends Firefox license in Ubuntu
Wwhat is trademarked are the names: Mozilla, Firefox (and any other names that Mozilla uses in their products) and the icons and visual identifiers associated with each of the names. The code itself is 100% free and unencumbered.

Debian solves the issue with Iceweasel instead of Firefox, Icedove instead of Thunderbird, and Iceape instead of Seamonkey. The GNU project did a similar thing, but put a GNU something or other in each of their names.

If I were Ubuntu, I would either respect Mozilla's wishes and acknowledge the Firefox license, or simply use the Debian Iceweasel, which, other than new names and logos, is functionally equivalent, but could occasionally differ in the security and bug fixes and precisely how and when they are applied. For all intents and purposes, though, the code is usually the same except for trademark related issues.
Posted by: masinick@...   Posted on: 09/16/08 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Never has a statement been more pure BS in the history of licensing.  xuniL_z | 09/15/08
This doesn't seem to me to be a traditional EULA  Michael Kelly | 09/15/08
RE: Shuttleworth defends Firefox license in Ubuntu  Vadim P. | 09/16/08
RE: Shuttleworth defends Firefox license in Ubuntu  Shmeg | 09/16/08
RE: Shuttleworth defends Firefox license in Ubuntu  masinick@... | 09/16/08
I think you have nothing better to do!  judgesinel@... | 09/16/08
RE: Shuttleworth defends Firefox license in Ubuntu  LamontC | 09/17/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Meet Doc