On MovieTome: The 10 worst movies of 2009 so far!
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 4 of 7:
Next »
« Previous
RE: Shuttleworth defends Firefox license in Ubuntu
Incorrect - anyone is allowed to modify Mozilla's code, with or without Mozilla's permission. That is handled in their code licensing under the MPL, and is the basis by which Firefox and other Mozilla products can be labeled as "free software" and "open source," in the common usage of that phrase.

The issues addressed by the EULA are nothing to do with the code, only with the branding, trademarks, etc which are included in the binary distributed versions, which are equally applicable to the developer and the user. Developers are allowed to patch any program, including removing the branding, from the Mozilla foundation, so long as they start from the source and follow the rules of the MPL that they are licensed under.
Posted by: Shmeg   Posted on: 09/16/08 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Never has a statement been more pure BS in the history of licensing.  xuniL_z | 09/15/08
This doesn't seem to me to be a traditional EULA  Michael Kelly | 09/15/08
RE: Shuttleworth defends Firefox license in Ubuntu  Vadim P. | 09/16/08
RE: Shuttleworth defends Firefox license in Ubuntu  Shmeg | 09/16/08
RE: Shuttleworth defends Firefox license in Ubuntu  masinick@... | 09/16/08
I think you have nothing better to do!  judgesinel@... | 09/16/08
RE: Shuttleworth defends Firefox license in Ubuntu  LamontC | 09/17/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Meet Doc