On TechRepublic: 10 lame phrases to cut from your resume
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 3 of 7:
Next »
« Previous
RE: Shuttleworth defends Firefox license in Ubuntu
The EULA is intended at developers - they have to have Mozilla's permission to modify the code. So,

a) Why stick an EULA into the face of users? It does not concern them, and
b) Developers are already asking, "How do I know which program can I patch?". Obviously, not many will bother asking Mozilla's permission.
Posted by: Vadim P.   Posted on: 09/16/08 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Never has a statement been more pure BS in the history of licensing.  xuniL_z | 09/15/08
This doesn't seem to me to be a traditional EULA  Michael Kelly | 09/15/08
RE: Shuttleworth defends Firefox license in Ubuntu  Vadim P. | 09/16/08
RE: Shuttleworth defends Firefox license in Ubuntu  Shmeg | 09/16/08
RE: Shuttleworth defends Firefox license in Ubuntu  masinick@... | 09/16/08
I think you have nothing better to do!  judgesinel@... | 09/16/08
RE: Shuttleworth defends Firefox license in Ubuntu  LamontC | 09/17/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement
  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More