On last.fm: Exclusive SXSW 2009 interviews
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 17 of 26:
Next »
« Previous
Not really
Sustaining an EM field only takes energy if there's something in the field to take away the energy. This is only really caused by the wiring of the transmitter and the field interacting with stray metallic (conducting) objects nearby. With proper design, efficiency and losses can be on par with your standard wall wart you leave plugged in when you're not charging your phone or PDA.

Hard drives are hard to demagnetize. There are already powerful magnets in the motors for these drives. Don't worry about it. Same goes for credit cards. I've put huge rare earth disc magnets in my pockets (pull force of ~200 lbs) and my credit cards still work fine.

Most mobile devices (PDA, phone, camera) don't even use magnetic storage. Flash memory won't be hurt by these fields.

The electric field strength of these fields is thousands of times less than the breakdown field strength of air. Assume 60W over a 25 sq. cm surface (say for a laptop with a charging unit the size of a very small cell phone). This is a power density of 24 kW/m^2. The electric field strength here would be 3 kV/m. It takes 3300 kV/m to cause an arc through air. That's a safety factor of over 1000.

If you increase the frequency of the delivered power, you're even less likely to have an effect on permanent magnetic storage (credit cards and hard drives), as these don't respond to fields of high frequency. As long as you keep the frequencies out of the communication bands of your devices, you won't notice any problems.

It sounds scary and all, but if you do the math and think about the physics, it's pretty safe.
Posted by: arkolbus   Posted on: 09/02/08 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Where's my wireless shoe phone?  Marcos El Malo | 08/22/08
humor  adr5@... | 09/11/08
Message has been deleted.  kingww'' | 08/22/08
RE: Intel teases shape-shifting programmable matter  kingww'' | 08/22/08
And in .....  Linux_4u! | 08/22/08
Medical Uses  Marcos El Malo | 08/22/08
RE: Intel teases shape-shifting programmable matter  lalalalalal | 08/22/08
RE: Intel teases shape-shifting programmable matter  David Gerard | 08/23/08
RE: Intel teases shape-shifting programmable matter  shifttab | 08/24/08
Replication in star trek is here  rider_tiger | 08/24/08
Replication in star trek is here...  rob@... | 08/25/08
Wirelessly transmit power... for Transport  robERR | 08/25/08
Nothing to worry about  David Gerard | 08/25/08
Sustaining an EM field takes POWER and MONEY  Takalok | 08/26/08
Erm...  Kazabet | 08/26/08
actually low power  mr.teeps | 09/01/08
Not really  arkolbus | 09/02/08
But, even if it does take power...  aditya2071990@... | 09/11/08
shades of Tesla  AtlantaTerry | 08/28/08
RE: Intel teases shape-shifting programmable matter  Fluxstringer | 09/01/08
RE: Intel teases shape-shifting programmable matter  mr.teeps | 09/01/08
RE: Intel teases shape-shifting programmable matter  paulw@... | 09/11/08
RE: Wireless charging  alzie@... | 09/11/08
A rebut  Todesschatten | 09/11/08
RE: Intel teases shape-shifting programmable matter  jeyost@... | 09/11/08
RE: Intel teases shape-shifting programmable matter  Melissa.digitalis | 10/12/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More