On GameFAQs: What is error code 80710092 on the PS3?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 12 of 62:
Next »
« Previous
What the US Copyright Office Says
http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.pdf

"What Is Copyright?
Copyright is a form of protection provided by the laws of the United States (title 17, U. S. Code) to the authors of ?original works of authorship,? including literary, dramatic, musical, artistic, and certain other intellectual works. This protection is available to both published and unpublished works. Section 106 of the 1976 Copyright Act generally gives the owner of copyright the exclusive right to do and to authorize others to do the following:
? To reproduce the work in copies or phonorecords;
? To prepare derivative works based upon the work;
? To distribute copies or phonorecords of the work to the public by sale or other transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease, or lending;
? To perform the work publicly, in the case of literary, musical, dramatic, and choreographic works, pantomimes, and motion pictures and other audiovisual
works;
? To display the work publicly, in the case of literary, musical, dramatic, and choreographic works, pantomimes, and pictorial, graphic, or sculptural
works, including the individual images of a motion picture or other audiovisual work; and
? In the case of sound recordings,* to perform the work publicly by means of a digital audio transmission.
In addition, certain authors of works of visual art have the rights of attribution and integrity as described in section 106A of the 1976 Copyright Act. For further information, see Circular 40, Copyright Registration for Works of the Visual Arts.
It is illegal for anyone to violate any of the rights provided by the copyright law to the owner of copyright. These rights, however, are not unlimited in
scope. Sections 107 through 121 of the 1976 Copyright Act establish limitations on these rights. In some cases, these limitations are specified exemptions from
copyright liability. One major limitation is the doctrine of ?fair use,? which is given a statutory basis in section 107 of the 1976 Copyright Act. In other instances, the limitation takes the form of a ?compulsory license? under which certain limited uses of copyrighted works are permitted upon payment of
specified royalties and compliance with statutory conditions. For further information about the limitations of any of these rights, consult the copyright law or write to the Copyright Office."

"How Long Copyright Protection Endures
Works Originally Created on or after January 1, 1978
A work that was created (fixed in tangible form for the first time) on or after January 1, 1978, is automatically protected from the moment of its creation and is ordinarily given a term enduring for the author?s life plus an additional 70 years after the author?s death. In the case of ?a joint work
prepared by two or more authors who did not work for hire,? the term lasts for 70 years after the last surviving author?s death. For works made for hire, and for anonymous and pseudonymous works (unless the author?s identity is revealed in Copyright Office records), the duration of copyright will be 95 years from publication or 120 years from creation, whichever is shorter.

Works Originally Created Before January 1, 1978,
But Not Published or Registered by That Date
These works have been automatically brought under the
statute and are now given federal copyright protection. The duration of copyright in these works is generally computed in the same way as for works created on or after January 1, 1978: the life-plus-70 or 95/120-year terms apply to them as well. The law provides that in no case would the term of copyright
for works in this category expire before December
31, 2002, and for works published on or before December 31, 2002, the term of copyright will not expire before December 31, 2047.

Works Originally Created and Published or Registered
before January 1, 1978
Under the law in effect before 1978, copyright was secured either on the date a work was published with a copyright notice or on the date of registration if the work was registered in unpublished form. In either case, the copyright endured for a first term of 28 years from the date it was secured. During the last (28th) year of the first term, the copyright was eligible for renewal. The Copyright Act of 1976
extended the renewal term from 28 to 47 years for copyrights that were subsisting on January 1, 1978, or for pre-1978 copyrights restored under the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA), making these works eligible for a total term of protection of 75 years.

Public Law 105-298, enacted on October 27, 1998, further extended the renewal term of copyrights
still subsisting on that date by an additional 20 years, providing for a renewal term of 67 years and a total term of protection of 95 years.

Public Law 102-307, enacted on June 26, 1992, amended
the 1976 Copyright Act to provide for automatic renewal of the term of copyrights secured between January 1, 1964, and December 31, 1977. Although the renewal term is automatically provided, the Copyright Office does not issue a renewal certificate for these works unless a renewal application and fee are received and registered in the Copyright Office.
Public Law 102-307 makes renewal registration optional.

Thus, filing for renewal registration is no longer required to extend the original 28-year copyright term to the full 95 years. However, some benefits accrue to renewal registrations that were made during the 28th year.

For more detailed information on renewal of copyright
and the copyright term, see Circular 15, Renewal of Copyright; Circular 15a, Duration of Copyright; and Circular 15t, Extension of Copyright Terms."
Posted by: jlafitte   Posted on: 08/07/08 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story No further replies to this post will be accepted.

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

WHAT???  Henaway | 07/25/08
Why waste money when it was just a nuisance??  wackoae | 07/25/08
Not an exact copy at all  ZDNET_guest666 | 07/25/08
Not a copy? Are you nuts?  JamesAHall | 07/25/08
Of course it's a knock-off, but it's not an exact copy  ZDNET_guest666 | 07/25/08
That's not true  JamesAHall | 07/29/08
Copyright law doesn't apply to ideas  ZDNET_guest666 | 07/29/08
Nope  dcmtr | 07/31/08
Scrabble has been around...  AtomicFusion | 07/25/08
Copyrights Are Renewable  Mark.Eichman | 07/26/08
That's not true  ZDNET_guest666 | 07/29/08
What the US Copyright Office Says  jlafitte | 08/07/08
No..  Etch44 | 08/07/08
Copyright doesn't apply - Hasbro has no case, bro  ZDNET_guest666 | 07/25/08
Copyright  kohathi | 07/25/08
14 years with optional 14-year renewal...  ZDNET_guest666 | 07/25/08
renewal is a wonderful thing  Socoling | 07/25/08
Read up on copyright history  ZDNET_guest666 | 07/29/08
assignation....  Socoling | 07/25/08
RE: Scrabble-Scrabulous standoff spells L-A-W-S-U-I-T  qwerty690 | 07/25/08
You can't copyright ideas.  ZDNET_guest666 | 07/25/08
A set of rules for a game is more than an idea once it gets published.  jk0726 | 07/26/08
No. Copyright covers wording, not ideas  ZDNET_guest666 | 07/29/08
confusing copyright, patent, and trademark  josephmartins | 08/07/08
Nope  fadzlan@... | 07/30/08
ah but lotus 123 was not the original spreadsheet  mombo | 08/07/08
Lotus 123???  The Smoking Man | 08/07/08
You're thinking of VisiCalc....  jlafitte | 08/07/08
two bites of the apple...  jlafitte | 08/07/08
RE: Scrabble-Scrabulous standoff spells L-A-W-S-U-I-T  Terrygirl | 07/25/08
the bottom line is.....  djd221 | 07/25/08
RE: Scrabble-Scrabulous standoff spells L-A-W-S-U-I-T  bill4935 | 07/25/08
And Yet...  Mark.Eichman | 07/26/08
Copyright needs to be protected by the owner  mombo | 08/07/08
Patent the Alphabet  ashworth102680 | 07/25/08
the alphabet was public domain  mombo | 08/07/08
So are words ...  The Smoking Man | 08/07/08
Next, the little geniuses can "invent" these Facebook games  Tech99_z | 07/25/08
Presentation on Copyright - Lawrence Lessig  jkantony | 07/26/08
Re: Presentation on Copyright - Lawrence Lessig  hitech_rednek | 08/07/08
70 years is too long  ZDNET_guest666 | 07/26/08
Agreed 100%  ZDNET_guest666 | 07/29/08
Disney ...  The Smoking Man | 08/07/08
RE: Scrabble-Scrabulous standoff spells L-A-W-S-U-I-T  saxmanb | 07/26/08
Why are performances "copyrighted"?  kohathi | 07/27/08
RE: Scrabble-Scrabulous standoff spells L-A-W-S-U-I-T  saxmanb | 07/27/08
RE: Scrabble-Scrabulous standoff spells L-A-W-S-U-I-T  Panda129 | 07/29/08
I agree, Hasbro has no case  rahullak@... | 07/29/08
that's where trademark comes in  merc2dogs` | 08/08/08
Not Copyright, but maybe Trademark breach  dhruva15 | 07/30/08
RE: Scrabble-Scrabulous standoff spells L-A-W-S-U-I-T  CBR1000F | 08/01/08
Just plain thievery  verelse | 08/04/08
Don't be Dumb  ericvorheese | 08/04/08
Don't be Dumber...  pmcm | 08/07/08
On Copyright and the Other Thing  tzenes | 08/04/08
Screw the customer  wystan1000 | 08/05/08
Evil Giant Coporate Copyrights  Draven35 | 08/07/08
Typically Insane Case  madrucke@... | 08/07/08
... and the winner will be ...  oldbaritone | 08/07/08
RE: Scrabble-Scrabulous standoff spells L-A-W-S-U-I-T  SphinxRising58 | 08/07/08
Well Said.  Dauplat | 08/07/08
RE: Scrabble-Scrabulous standoff spells L-A-W-S-U-I-T  The Smoking Man | 08/07/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement