First what is SPAM
voska | 08/25/04
|

It is...
James T. Kirk | 08/25/04
|
 
You illustrate the point perfectly
voska | 08/25/04
|
  
No
James T. Kirk | 08/25/04
|
   
Point is some don't agree with you
voska | 08/25/04
|
    
Why change the definition?
Martin Marvinski | 08/25/04
|
    
Spam is not in the eye of the beholder
fmaxwell | 08/26/04
|
   
Yes
Erik1234 | 08/26/04
|
    
Thanks, Erik!
jaoifalkjsdao | 08/27/04
|
   
Exactly! NT
KOS-MOS | 08/31/04
|
I prefer something this century.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/25/04
|

Oh come on
James T. Kirk | 08/25/04
|
 
Get Real...
Wolfie2K3 | 08/27/04
|

Re: I prefer something this century.
Minas Beede | 08/25/04
|
Making Assumptions
Roger Ramjet | 08/25/04
|

1 Billion dollars isn't that much actually
voska | 08/25/04
|
 
Come to think of it...
toadlife | 08/27/04
|
"undamental knowledge systems? Why not just use something simple?
Minas Beede | 08/25/04
|
easy solution
Byron Hadley | 08/25/04
|
No, you don't get to redefine the term.
fmaxwell | 08/26/04
|
Are there any send-side technologies?
jaoifalkjsdao | 08/27/04
|

Thanks Minas Beede
jaoifalkjsdao | 08/27/04
|
 
Glad to do it.
Minas Beede | 08/27/04
|
Same old solution. Let's try to keep it simple.
toadlife | 08/27/04
|