On GameSpot: Create your own gaming holiday wishlist!
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 20 of 24:
Next »
« Previous
No, you don't get to redefine the term.
There is an accepted definition of spam: Unsolicited commercial e-mail. You can't simply change that definition to suit your own purposes. If you didn't request it or give explicit permission for it to be sent, then it's spam. It doesn't matter if you like it, enjoy reading it, or would have requested it had you known about it.
Posted by: fmaxwell   Posted on: 08/26/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

First what is SPAM  voska | 08/25/04
It is...  James T. Kirk | 08/25/04
You illustrate the point perfectly  voska | 08/25/04
No  James T. Kirk | 08/25/04
Point is some don't agree with you  voska | 08/25/04
Why change the definition?  Martin Marvinski | 08/25/04
Spam is not in the eye of the beholder  fmaxwell | 08/26/04
Yes  Erik1234 | 08/26/04
Thanks, Erik!  jaoifalkjsdao | 08/27/04
Exactly! NT  KOS-MOS | 08/31/04
I prefer something this century.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/25/04
Oh come on  James T. Kirk | 08/25/04
Get Real...  Wolfie2K3 | 08/27/04
Re: I prefer something this century.  Minas Beede | 08/25/04
Making Assumptions  Roger Ramjet | 08/25/04
1 Billion dollars isn't that much actually  voska | 08/25/04
Come to think of it...  toadlife | 08/27/04
"undamental knowledge systems? Why not just use something simple?  Minas Beede | 08/25/04
easy solution  Byron Hadley | 08/25/04
No, you don't get to redefine the term.  fmaxwell | 08/26/04
Are there any send-side technologies?  jaoifalkjsdao | 08/27/04
Thanks Minas Beede  jaoifalkjsdao | 08/27/04
Glad to do it.  Minas Beede | 08/27/04
Same old solution. Let's try to keep it simple.  toadlife | 08/27/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Meet Doc