On TV.com: TOP 10 Shows CANCELED Too Soon
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 12 of 24:
Next »
« Previous
Oh come on
You mean you don't have faith in the ability of our "Hey, look what we did for you stupid gits!!! Now relect me!!!" CAN-Spam law to deal with the problem?

The politicians keep telling us to wait a little longer and it will start working. Are you suggesting you don't believe them?

Me either.
Posted by: James T. Kirk   Posted on: 08/25/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

First what is SPAM  voska | 08/25/04
It is...  James T. Kirk | 08/25/04
You illustrate the point perfectly  voska | 08/25/04
No  James T. Kirk | 08/25/04
Point is some don't agree with you  voska | 08/25/04
Why change the definition?  Martin Marvinski | 08/25/04
Spam is not in the eye of the beholder  fmaxwell | 08/26/04
Yes  Erik1234 | 08/26/04
Thanks, Erik!  jaoifalkjsdao | 08/27/04
Exactly! NT  KOS-MOS | 08/31/04
I prefer something this century.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/25/04
Oh come on  James T. Kirk | 08/25/04
Get Real...  Wolfie2K3 | 08/27/04
Re: I prefer something this century.  Minas Beede | 08/25/04
Making Assumptions  Roger Ramjet | 08/25/04
1 Billion dollars isn't that much actually  voska | 08/25/04
Come to think of it...  toadlife | 08/27/04
"undamental knowledge systems? Why not just use something simple?  Minas Beede | 08/25/04
easy solution  Byron Hadley | 08/25/04
No, you don't get to redefine the term.  fmaxwell | 08/26/04
Are there any send-side technologies?  jaoifalkjsdao | 08/27/04
Thanks Minas Beede  jaoifalkjsdao | 08/27/04
Glad to do it.  Minas Beede | 08/27/04
Same old solution. Let's try to keep it simple.  toadlife | 08/27/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here