Security software--can we get it right?

Well, before the drool started to pool on my keyboard: I got out of this:

Security Software developers are bringing products out that they can build.

Users need to grab control of the process, and direct the development to build what they want and need, not what can just be built.

BUT - they need to figger out what they need and therefore want...

AND lots and lots of money has to be tossed onto a table or tables so that the Jericho group can figger out what the rest of the world of users need, and therefore would lust greatly for....

AND open source is the preferred way to go, as proprietary vendors have a nasty habit of telling user groups what it is that they need, and therefore can provide a product that users would greatly lust over. This causing panic amongst the Jericho group - as it is their intent to generate lust and desire for product...

BUT the open source people have to get their act together, and at that point the eyelids were growing very very heavy and I lost my way, started dreaming about groups of people pointing fingers at each other, screaming about lust generation quotients, and open source prophylactics being more secure and leakproof than branded proprietary ones - at this point I woke up and wiped the drool off my keyboard....; Posted by: quietLee Posted on: 08/17/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Reply to Story Reply to Message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Okay, you got me. Anton Philidor | 08/17/04

What do you think?

Here to help you with your Document Management Needs
Doc is an enigma. Born to a Russian ballerina and a German electrical engineer, he grew up in various locations in the United States. He’s seen the insides of more brands, versions, and generations of printer and printer-related hardware than almost anyone.
To learn more about this mysterious figure check out his blog on ZDNet. You’ll be glad you did.
Produced by
ZDNet and