On GameFAQs: The top 10 most terrifying PC games
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 3 of 6:
Next »
« Previous
dev process
Totally agree about vendor-drive projects. Disagree about pixels up front. Unless you've been working w/the same technology for 10 years and know every single nuance, pitfall and oddball occurrance that can happen, there's no substitute for an end-to-end prototype. W/o fail, every project I've worked on has needed some major/minor design retooling based on technology, functionality or dev process constraints. Much better to find those out early than late.
Posted by: suzzer   Posted on: 11/13/03 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Spot on  Nigel Johnstone | 11/13/03
Mr. Brittan, Since when...  FirstNLastN | 11/13/03
dev process  suzzer | 11/13/03
but  lmaxwell | 11/13/03
Where you missed.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/13/03
unless  lmaxwell | 11/14/03

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Premier Vendor Content Whitepapers, webcasts & resources from our Power Center Sponsors
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here