On TV.com: MEGAN FOX Photos
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 36 of 42:
Next »
« Previous
I do like software patents if....
If they adhere to the principles of invention, that they are uniquely created tools to complete a desired end or result.

If some individual creates a certain tool such as a car part that allows increased functionality, he should have the right to patent it. If someone creates code that allows a unique and necessary result for something, it is the same. How many software patents does Microsoft have?

I work for the govt., and often write software. We patented 2 of the codes I wrote as they embodied processes and data compiled over decades at great expense. If we could not protect these codes with patents, then some other organization would take our methods and the govt would have to pay for what they invented already! This has happened in my line of work, I have seen at least 4 cases of it- and it costs the taxpayers money. It was extra work on my part to process the patent paperwork. Most would not want the bother. But diligence in cases like this saves the taxpayers.
Posted by: robert.w.michaelson@...   Posted on: 02/28/08 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Rare win  John L. Ries | 02/26/08
There seems to be a bit of dancing here by the Plantiff..  rtirman37@... | 02/27/08
This is not about what's fair...  Information_z | 02/28/08
Patenting software seems strange...  MikeZane | 02/27/08
how strange is it? btw, no mention in patent reform act  moskowitzs | 02/27/08
Cross Merck and see ...  knot_mine | 02/27/08
not quite..  STDog | 02/27/08
A fantasy  bmerc | 02/27/08
Truer words were never spoken!  Ole Man | 02/27/08
Neither is fair. Sheer lunacy to the whole mess  Cayble | 02/27/08
I agree.  Bruizer | 02/27/08
Can you?  scoobbs@... | 02/27/08
Out to lunch  Cayble | 02/27/08
And perhaps that is why most IP law is  Mahegan | 02/27/08
Properly patenting software ...  lalogos | 02/27/08
rediculous patent laws  pcguy777 | 03/13/08
judges care too much about MS's wellbeing to rule fairly. they'll let M$  wessonjoe | 02/27/08
What about MSFT paying the fine to be held in excrow...  Confused by religion | 02/27/08
What about you?  scoobbs@... | 02/27/08
You just validated Milly with even realizing it  GuidingLight | 02/28/08
RE: Patent court rules in Microsoft patent spat  agohige | 02/27/08
Bogus?  drobinow | 02/27/08
So...  scoobbs@... | 02/27/08
A few engineers can write software and that's it  BALTHOR | 02/27/08
This ...  scoobbs@... | 02/27/08
Has anyone heard it yet?  scoobbs@... | 02/27/08
Linking files to DB's has been around since the dawn of time itselt  pcguy777 | 02/27/08
Patents  Altotus | 02/27/08
Surely...  scoobbs@... | 02/27/08
code  trm1945 | 02/27/08
Software patents is a defective idea. It goes against the purpose  hkommedal | 02/27/08
Is it?  scoobbs@... | 02/27/08
Remember thar most of the world do NOT recognize software patents.  hkommedal | 02/28/08
Not quite right  s_carter2000@... | 02/28/08
I don't like the idea of software patents  kedens | 02/27/08
I do like software patents if....  robert.w.michaelson@... | 02/28/08
How many patents?  cheesyone | 02/28/08
What is wrong with copyright. That is a lot more automatic and  hkommedal | 02/28/08
What is wrong with copyright. That is a lot more ...  TiggerTom | 02/28/08
What about prior art  Altotus | 03/13/08
Patent process is need of review  Boot_Agnostic | 02/28/08
And politicians and Corporate bigwigs  Ole Man | 03/01/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Meet Doc