On mySimon: Backpacker Magazine Award Winners
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 3 of 24:
Next »
« Previous
Easily proven of course
It seems simple enough. The accuser just have to prove they were not paid. Microsoft needs to prove there was an agreement and they have paid. Since I believe Chinese use paperwork as well, there should be documents to prove everything.
Posted by: glocks out   Posted on: 01/18/08 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

More frivolous claims...  Mike Cox | 01/18/08
That must be why...  John L. Ries | 01/21/08
Easily proven of course  glocks out | 01/18/08
Chinese Gov't Corruption is the Key  wellduh | 01/25/08
Maybe MS will get it negated  Boot_Agnostic | 01/18/08
That would assume...  John L. Ries | 01/22/08
That may well be the reason  wellduh | 01/25/08
making MS stuff public domain in China  Boot_Agnostic | 03/12/08
Be careful what you wish for...  John L. Ries | 01/21/08
yup time to make MSware GPL  wellduh | 01/25/08
not an MS fan  b dayley | 01/21/08
re: not an MS fan  james.faction | 01/21/08
It might be because...  John L. Ries | 01/21/08
RE: Microsoft accused of patent violation in China  peter.cogger@... | 01/21/08
shoulda quit while you were ahead...  1stcyberian | 01/22/08
OoooH MS terrorist  wellduh | 01/25/08
RE: Microsoft accused of patent violation in China  baporopat@... | 01/21/08
RE: Microsoft accused of patent violation in China  jinoc@... | 01/22/08
bullsh---  rebelxhardcore | 01/22/08
RE: Microsoft accused of patent violation in China  Popsprice | 01/23/08
RE: Microsoft accused of patent violation in China  jlafitte | 01/23/08
How about...  whoisbp | 01/23/08
Why only GPL software should be used  wellduh | 01/25/08
No such thing as Piracy -- Updates free to all  wellduh | 01/26/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here