On TV.com: 10 Most ANNOYING Characters On TV
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 19 of 26:
Next »
« Previous
If you used
Google you would find it easy enough...

[url=http://www.taxpayer.net/greenscissors/LearnMore/senatefossilfuelsubsidies.htm]Item #1[/url]

[url=http://go.ucsusa.org/publications/report.cfm?publicationID=149]Item #2[/url]

[url=http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8LNLLBG0&show_article=1]Item #3[/url]

[url=http://www.monitor.net/monitor/10-9-95/oilsubsidy.html]Item #4[/url]

[url=http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/servicerpt/subsidy/pdf/appendix_a.pdf]From the DOE itself[/url]

Your stance on this issue is quite self evident. You have a vested interest or work for big oil. Your sole purpose is to spread FUD about alternative energy and to instill a sense of inability to do anything to push the green agenda forward. Sorry but people are getting wise and realizing that oil is not the future and that solar, wind, wave and other renewable energy sources are the way of the future.

The longer we wait the more damage will be caused to not only the environment but to the consumer as well. Government subsidizes a lot of things and big oil is one of the largest to receive these breaks.

[url=http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/04/26/BAG4CIFE721.DTL]Political purchase #1[/url]

[url=http://thehill.com/business--lobby/criticism-contributions-flow-2005-11-09.html]Political purchase #2[/url]

[url=http://www.skeptically.org/curpol/id23.html]Political purchase #3[/url]

[url=http://www.opensecrets.org/industries/indus.asp?Ind=E01]Political purchase #4[/url]

Now with that kind of money flowing into politicians coffers, do you really believe they will back solar or alternative energy? Only if we the people start exercising our political right and might. Bottom line big oil is buying a stay of execution while at the same time riding on the tax-payers in the form of tax breaks and subsidies funded by the tax payer via the government. The facts are in evidence... devil
Posted by: Linux User 147560   Posted on: 12/13/07 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Citizens are going to end up paying one way or other.  JohnMcGrew@... | 12/11/07
Why  Jack-Booted EULA | 12/11/07
Because...  JohnMcGrew@... | 12/11/07
Greed...  Linux User 147560 | 12/11/07
Well...  shogun37@... | 12/12/07
Solar needs to be able to survive without tax subsidies  georgeou | 12/11/07
BS George  Linux User 147560 | 12/11/07
Okay, I'll bite  JohnMcGrew@... | 12/11/07
Start chewing  Linux User 147560 | 12/11/07
Complete nonsense  JohnMcGrew@... | 12/13/07
Nice!  Linux User 147560 | 12/13/07
If that is the case, then it seems to me...  JohnMcGrew@... | 12/14/07
Start chewing  Linux User 147560 | 12/11/07
I disagree  voska | 12/11/07
Total nonsense  JohnMcGrew@... | 12/11/07
OIL GETS MAD SUBSIDIES, YO  EcologicalSystems.biz | 12/11/07
Excellent point!  Linux User 147560 | 12/12/07
And what subsidies would those be...  JohnMcGrew@... | 12/13/07
If you used  Linux User 147560 | 12/13/07
Complete ignorance and nonsense  JohnMcGrew@... | 12/25/07
It's not subsidies  voska | 12/12/07
Or even worse...  JohnMcGrew@... | 12/11/07
And when are the other technologies going to pay their share?  thetruth_z | 12/12/07
Coal etc, gets breaks  daver_z | 12/12/07
a simple market-based solution with mandates  erlewis@... | 12/12/07
The cost of CO2  daver_z | 12/12/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

SmartPlanet

Click Here