On TV.com: LADY GAGA Photos
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 4 of 19:
Next »
« Previous
Exactly, and...
Patent offices are poorly poorly equipped or able to tell truly inventive software if they fell over it. To them, every new piece of software is inventive, even if any moron who had a reason to develop it would come up with a similar if not identical program.
Posted by: Cayble   Posted on: 10/10/07 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Reform?  Tim Patterson | 10/10/07
Be very afraid  frgough | 10/10/07
Sorry but you're so very wrong  maldain | 10/10/07
Exactly, and...  Cayble | 10/10/07
Sourcing has astronomical elasticity. Example: Compression RDK_aa3.4.6..i2  RobeTirm@... | 10/10/07
What?  James T. Kirk | 10/10/07
I think he used one of those spam nonsense generators to create that (nt)  enduser_z | 10/10/07
I question the validity of your first statement  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/10/07
RE: Limiting Continuations  DigiMediaMan | 10/10/07
RE: Fixing a broken patent system  wpenrose | 10/10/07
IP lawyer yes; patent attorney no  DigiMediaMan | 10/10/07
RE: Fixing a broken patent system  mabe3 | 10/10/07
Ummm, no...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/10/07
Prior art often exists which could make patent applications fraud  David Chassels | 10/10/07
How would you do that?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/10/07
I don't think that's what he was suggesting  maldain | 10/10/07
Its not the small guys it's the big ones that need to be held to account  David Chassels | 10/11/07
RE: Fixing a broken patent system  eengnerd | 10/10/07
All patents must die [nt]  Omch'Ar | 10/10/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Meet Doc