On CBS MoneyWatch: 6 things NOT to do on Twitter, Facebook
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 18 of 24:
Next »
« Previous
we need to define rich
"It is not the rich that is the problem. Twenty percent for them would be a reduction in taxes."

we are talking really rich 6 figure incomes are not in that catagory - I am talking the ones making more then you or I in 10 lifetimes and paying less then 10 cents on the dollar
Posted by: lmaxwell   Posted on: 11/11/03 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Laws?  Doug@... | 11/10/03
Wow (I hate these new talkbacks)  Patrick Jones | 11/10/03
Correction  Patrick Jones | 11/10/03
Yet another alias for bitty?  NoB$ | 11/10/03
Legalized theft...  Tim Patterson | 11/10/03
just be glad  lmaxwell | 11/10/03
What a jerk.  NoB$ | 11/10/03
just have to give you smokers  lmaxwell | 11/10/03
Always call it "losing tax revenue"  MilesFroom | 11/10/03
Give them  ParadigmOdyssey | 11/10/03
Whoa...  Just Lee | 11/10/03
[ ] Marks the spot.  ParadigmOdyssey | 11/10/03
what we need is to stop the madness  lmaxwell | 11/10/03
That just makes too much sense  voska | 11/10/03
What about the law of diminishing returns?  AbsolutelyNot | 11/10/03
I hate these talkbacks  Patrick Jones | 11/11/03
But At What Cost?  RollcageTech | 11/11/03
we need to define rich  lmaxwell | 11/11/03
You must be joking...  Chaino | 11/11/03
not true  lmaxwell | 11/11/03
The topic is not tax rate but loss of privacy  finn@... | 11/12/03
from what i heard  lmaxwell | 11/11/03
Fight Back  RichardGetz | 11/12/03
Let Them Pay  perryman | 11/13/03

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here