On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 35 of 47:
Next »
« Previous
Does not cause that huge an increase in patents.
The first to file system (which I do not necessarily agree with) would not change the need for something original and not intuitively obvious. The patent system requires that (even after this bill) and it cannot be something like "add a new spoke to a bike wheel." The Japanese system is more like that. Additionally, the patent law requires that it have a stated use (so filing something on the thought of future application does not apply).

Finally, many people are implying because if you don't file you lose out that it will increase the patents...we already do that, just a bit differently. ONCE PUBLIC you have a very short time (about a year, or 18 months) to file a patent or lose your idea to public domain. This is true EVEN IF YOU DID NOT MAKE IT PUBLIC BUT SOMEONE ELSE DOES. SO there is already the built in rush to the patent office. All this does is compress the time even more. MY main objection is that by compressing this time even more you are increasing the COSTS for the little guy.

I DO agree that it might increase the total patents by getting components patented in rapid succession. That is not ALL bad as it forces the patent to be simpler in many ways. This is important as there is a huge backlog already.

I am slightly ambivilant about the first to file versus first to invent, as noted the rest of the world does it first to file.

It does not remove the need for you to prove YOU invented it (e.g. you did not steal the ideal). It does, unfortunately, probably cause more lawsuits in that area though.

I ramble and digress. The real flaws in the patent system remain, which is what IS patentable. (e.g. why in the f*ck does Amazon get a patent on the "one click shopping" concept! That is not patentable, in my person re-write of the patent law).
Posted by: StanislavF   Posted on: 09/10/07 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Thank you Marcy Kaptor - big transnational companies  mighetto | 09/07/07
OK - now i believe everyone else.  nomorems | 09/07/07
RE: House votes to overhaul patent system  frgough | 09/07/07
Not!  nomorems | 09/07/07
yeah, note google complaining about honest judges  gabrielbear@... | 09/10/07
That's a joke, right?  rjcarlson49 | 09/10/07
My problem with first to file is...  John L. Ries | 09/07/07
Agree  Tim Patterson | 09/08/07
Anti-competitive!=Anti-capitalist  John L. Ries | 09/08/07
Umm, who "invented" radio?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/07
I think Tesla actually did the research...  John L. Ries | 09/10/07
Tesla-Radio-First to invent versus first to file.  StanislavF | 09/10/07
Maybe first to postmark?  JoeysLapTop | 09/11/07
The other problem I see...  Bob.Kerns | 09/09/07
The beauty of "first to file"  kbaily05@... | 09/10/07
not true  zoroaster | 09/10/07
.....and patenting 'discoveries'  alblake | 09/10/07
Patents != Capitalism  Tim Patterson | 09/08/07
Patent search costs are a barrier to individuals  alpyne2@... | 09/14/07
As a software patent holder...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/07
Good ideas Bit...  Tim Patterson | 09/09/07
re: As a software patent holder...  CobraA1 | 09/10/07
hmmm  balaknair | 09/10/07
"No Axe" for Senator...  jtenser@... | 09/10/07
Re: No_Ax...  STDog | 09/10/07
OMG! Pigs are flying...  Dr. John | 09/10/07
Better idea . . .  Raymond Danner | 09/10/07
re "House OKs revamp of patent system"  CobraA1 | 09/10/07
what's the unaddressed core issue?  seanwal111111 | 09/10/07
RE: House votes to overhaul patent system  GIGOmat | 09/10/07
All patents must die [nt]  Omch'Ar | 09/10/07
Those dastardly corporations  DaveMorris | 09/10/07
Maybe so... but  jdriddle | 09/10/07
RE: House votes to overhaul patent system  Don't Ask Me | 09/10/07
Does not cause that huge an increase in patents.  StanislavF | 09/10/07
EVEN MICROSOFT LINKS TO BitTorrent  BALTHOR | 09/10/07
RE: House votes to overhaul patent system  walkerjian@... | 09/10/07
RE: House votes to overhaul patent system  rhill33 | 09/10/07
Foreign Patent Systems  davidsarmstrong | 09/10/07
RE: House votes to overhaul patent system  rzz1950 | 09/11/07
Use it or loose it.  zclayton2 | 09/11/07
"Defensive" Patents  optimist134 | 09/11/07
lame  kouzen | 09/11/07
lame? legitimate?  optimist134 | 09/12/07
Sorry, but I just....  cheesyone | 09/11/07
Legitimate? Lame?  optimist134 | 09/12/07
RE: House votes to overhaul patent system  locodragon2003 | 09/11/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here