On TV.com: Why Is Everyone in TV High School SO OLD
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 23 of 47:
Next »
« Previous
hmmm
Well said
Must say I agree, especially with
"2. Software patents should have a life of no more than 5 years for any reason. No extentions. If indeed the idea of a patent is to promote innovation and give the invetor a chance at seeing a return on his/her investment then 5 years in the software world is more than enough to accomplish that. The flip side of that is that if the idea was not able to generate a return on the investment in that time, it is questionable that it should have ever been granted a patent.

3. Must defend. Patents should be treated the same way a trademark is. When the holder knows it is being violated they hold a responsibility to defend it immediately. Put an end to the "submarine patent" that comes out years after something has become widely used.

4. Software patents must be renewed on an annual basis with an ever increasing fee. If it's a good idea/concept and has a value, then the holder would surely be willing to spend the money for renewal. If it's value doesn't justify the cost of renewal then it hardly deserves patent protection.

5. Within two years of recieving a patent, it MUST be implemented in a product offered in the market, or the patent is automatically dropped. It makes no sense to allow me (or anyone) to file a patent on say Artificial Intelegence based on Quantum Mechanics with the idea that someone will do it someday and I'll get paid big time. (thats a huge issue with the first to file idea)"


not often i find myself agreeing with your views, no_ax, but I believe this time you Have hit the nail on the head
cheerio
Posted by: balaknair   Posted on: 09/10/07 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Thank you Marcy Kaptor - big transnational companies  mighetto | 09/07/07
OK - now i believe everyone else.  nomorems | 09/07/07
RE: House votes to overhaul patent system  frgough | 09/07/07
Not!  nomorems | 09/07/07
yeah, note google complaining about honest judges  gabrielbear@... | 09/10/07
That's a joke, right?  rjcarlson49 | 09/10/07
My problem with first to file is...  John L. Ries | 09/07/07
Agree  Tim Patterson | 09/08/07
Anti-competitive!=Anti-capitalist  John L. Ries | 09/08/07
Umm, who "invented" radio?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/07
I think Tesla actually did the research...  John L. Ries | 09/10/07
Tesla-Radio-First to invent versus first to file.  StanislavF | 09/10/07
Maybe first to postmark?  JoeysLapTop | 09/11/07
The other problem I see...  Bob.Kerns | 09/09/07
The beauty of "first to file"  kbaily05@... | 09/10/07
not true  zoroaster | 09/10/07
.....and patenting 'discoveries'  alblake | 09/10/07
Patents != Capitalism  Tim Patterson | 09/08/07
Patent search costs are a barrier to individuals  alpyne2@... | 09/14/07
As a software patent holder...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/07
Good ideas Bit...  Tim Patterson | 09/09/07
re: As a software patent holder...  CobraA1 | 09/10/07
hmmm  balaknair | 09/10/07
"No Axe" for Senator...  jtenser@... | 09/10/07
Re: No_Ax...  STDog | 09/10/07
OMG! Pigs are flying...  Dr. John | 09/10/07
Better idea . . .  Raymond Danner | 09/10/07
re "House OKs revamp of patent system"  CobraA1 | 09/10/07
what's the unaddressed core issue?  seanwal111111 | 09/10/07
RE: House votes to overhaul patent system  GIGOmat | 09/10/07
All patents must die [nt]  Omch'Ar | 09/10/07
Those dastardly corporations  DaveMorris | 09/10/07
Maybe so... but  jdriddle | 09/10/07
RE: House votes to overhaul patent system  Don't Ask Me | 09/10/07
Does not cause that huge an increase in patents.  StanislavF | 09/10/07
EVEN MICROSOFT LINKS TO BitTorrent  BALTHOR | 09/10/07
RE: House votes to overhaul patent system  walkerjian@... | 09/10/07
RE: House votes to overhaul patent system  rhill33 | 09/10/07
Foreign Patent Systems  davidsarmstrong | 09/10/07
RE: House votes to overhaul patent system  rzz1950 | 09/11/07
Use it or loose it.  zclayton2 | 09/11/07
"Defensive" Patents  optimist134 | 09/11/07
lame  kouzen | 09/11/07
lame? legitimate?  optimist134 | 09/12/07
Sorry, but I just....  cheesyone | 09/11/07
Legitimate? Lame?  optimist134 | 09/12/07
RE: House votes to overhaul patent system  locodragon2003 | 09/11/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement
  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More