On TV.com: Top 15 TV THEME Songs
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 18 of 29:
Next »
« Previous
Your ignorance is astounding
Gee I guess I have to spell it out for the mentally disabled. Ok then, the theory behind second source implies cross platform compatibility. Are you with me so far? No. Well what happens when your system crashes due to viruses, hackers, bad OS? Do you move it to that second source which has the same vulnerabilities? Well you would if you were retarded but like any rat in a maze, eventually those electric shocks to your gonads will communicate something and you will probably transfer your system to a second source that lacks those vulnerabilities. But can your code port? Can your DB port? Can your DB middleware port? It can if you plan for cross platform compatibility.

As a friend of mine that runs some high end enterprise level Oracle systems at Boeing once told me, he said they never use PL-SQL and I said why? He said well what if we want to move that DB to DB2 or SQL Server? That code only works with Oracle and so we would have to rewrite all the code.

A truly second source system would lack the vulnerabilities of the first system. And in order to avoid coding all the same stuff all over for this other system, you plan for it ahead of time by making all your code and your data platform independent.

Any idiot who uses the exact same system for a second source is just asking for the problem to be repeated or to be perpetuated.
Posted by: poocow666   Posted on: 06/17/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Second Source  poocow666 | 06/16/04
Open source not so open  Anton Philidor | 06/16/04
This wasn't about lock in  NemesisNL | 06/18/04
Single vendor efficiency  poocow666 | 06/16/04
Yes, efficient.  Anton Philidor | 06/16/04
No such thing as Linux Lock-in  poocow666 | 06/16/04
So then...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/16/04
Or...  Martin Marvinski | 06/24/04
Would you prefer Red Hat lock-in?  Anton Philidor | 06/17/04
Wrong again...  poocow666 | 06/17/04
Who heads Fedora?  Anton Philidor | 06/17/04
JetBlue  jjworleyeoe | 06/16/04
JetBlue said the goal is to be sole sourced ....  oldskool | 06/17/04
That's Not What I've Heard JetBlue Say . .  jjworleyeoe | 06/18/04
Not always true, there are many issues to consider.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/16/04
No problems for Nasa???  poocow666 | 06/16/04
Dear ranter...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/16/04
Your ignorance is astounding  poocow666 | 06/17/04
It's "just fine" that there are no Shuttles running?  mlindl | 06/16/04
umm, perhaps your definition of successful is "biased"  oldskool | 06/16/04
Single source evolution  Anton Philidor | 06/17/04
NASA lost its mission and now its just another government agency  oldskool | 06/17/04
Ax has a point, but not a good example...  Judas I. | 06/17/04
these FBI/CIA intel shotages are trumped up  oldskool | 06/17/04
Um, I think you may have missed my point...  Judas I. | 06/18/04
How To ?  pj-xmesh | 06/16/04
One of Linux's biggest strengths  zijiang | 06/17/04
I used the iTunes Music Store yesterday  mlindl | 06/16/04
Open Source Is Multiple Source  rtb | 06/23/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement

SmartPlanet

  • Thought-provoking progressive ideas on diverse topics that intersect with technology, business, and life, and matter to the world at large. Visit SmartPlanet
  • More from IBM
  • Innovate your business' process model, play against the market, compete against others on our scoreboards and WIN! Try INNOV8 2.0: A BPM Simulator
  • Enabling Real-World Business Transformation through IBM Service Management Read the EMA Analyst Report
Click Here