On mySimon: Skullcandy Hesh Headphones
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 8 of 68:
Next »
« Previous
MS and Interoperability
I am not saying open source has no value or that its an unworkable alternative. The problem is that in the corporate setting poeple want interoprability and Stallman is dead set against it.


Stallman is against it? How can that be?

What do you need from someone in order to interoperate with their product? A clear specification of how their product communicates. Stallman's work ensures that you can get the clearest specification of communication of all: the source code.

Look, that facts are that Microsoft tried to work with the distros to obtain interop, and Stallman went off the deep end like a raving maniac and re-wrote the GPL (3) to prevent it from happening.


The facts are that Microsoft could, by themselves, create complete interoperability between their products and any FS/OSS product out there. They have their own source and they have complete access to the other product's source. If they really wanted interoperability they could have created years ago!

And they don't need these silly agreements with Linux vendors to do it either. My Linux OS interoperates just fine with a closed source ATI graphics driver. For example, Microsoft could have created a closed source SMB client for computers running Linux. They have full access to all the required information and could still keep their precious secrets hidden in a binary blob.

They don't want interoperability despite what they or you say. Actions speak far louder than words.
Posted by: alandd   Posted on: 08/09/07 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

You begin with a false premis  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/09/07
Ridiculous  Tim Patterson | 08/09/07
You are confusing the message with the man.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/09/07
"interoprability"???  casse_couille | 08/09/07
Did that rant help you? I sure hope so...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/09/07
He is right  deaf_e_kate | 08/09/07
I disagree  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/09/07
MS and Interoperability  alandd | 08/09/07
Not under GPL-3  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/09/07
gpl v3  Arm A. Geddon | 08/09/07
Please don't feed the troll  TtfnJohn | 08/09/07
I get bored.  odubtaig | 08/10/07
Ignoring the last 16 years  alandd | 08/09/07
Have you read it closely?  Patrick Jones | 08/10/07
re: MS and Interoperability  Arm A. Geddon | 08/09/07
Those with no argument try to hide behind ridicule...  BanjoPaterson | 08/09/07
So your saying Stallman wrote GPL-3 out of fear?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/09/07
Not Fear - A Rational Response...  BanjoPaterson | 08/09/07
Rational as in Microsoft's actions.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/09/07
"It works both ways"  Ole Man | 08/09/07
Look, have you ever sat and really listened  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/09/07
"Look, have you ever sat and really" READ?  Ole Man | 08/10/07
A thief is seldom afraid of his intended victim  Ole Man | 08/09/07
What in the h*ll are you ranting about?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/09/07
You have been diagnosed with sinility?  B.O.F.H. | 08/09/07
No, but would you like me to tell you what your mom  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/10/07
Are you trying toinsult people that are smarter than yourself?  B.O.F.H. | 08/10/07
Whose the wacko?  nbjayme | 08/09/07
Only time will tell.  CobraA1 | 08/09/07
The price of freedom is eternal vigilance - TJ  BanjoPaterson | 08/09/07
Do you feel that people need to be reminded or are you convincing yourself?  balsover | 08/09/07
Keep in mind that Jerremy  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/09/07
Are you stalking Jeremy?  Ole Man | 08/09/07
No fool, it was a huge story right here  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/09/07
So you are admittedly a confirmed scalawag?  Ole Man | 08/10/07
Jeremy has options, No_Ax_to_Grind does not.  B.O.F.H. | 08/09/07
When you have nothing worth saying, say something stupid.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/10/07
We already know your motto.  B.O.F.H. | 08/10/07
There was a violation...  nbjayme | 08/09/07
There was NO violation  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/10/07
There was NO violation  Ole Man | 08/10/07
Going mental are we?  nbjayme | 08/11/07
Different motivations  russell@... | 08/09/07
"Copying DVDs and sharing..."  douglasids | 08/09/07
thats the same for Windows Too  deaf_e_kate | 08/09/07
"only interested in open source because of the bottom line"  Ole Man | 08/09/07
Knock... knock  nbjayme | 08/09/07
About GNU/Linux  TtfnJohn | 08/09/07
depends on what you refer to...  nbjayme | 08/09/07
A lot of sound and fury...signifying nothing  TtfnJohn | 08/09/07
Column is mangled - first two paragraphs missing.  JeremyAllison | 08/09/07
Also missing the quote at the end.  JeremyAllison | 08/09/07
Fixed - thanks !  JeremyAllison | 08/09/07
I would just like to add this link about richard stallman...  Arm A. Geddon | 08/09/07
Stallman's idealism is killing open source.  kraterz | 08/09/07
Open Source != Free Software  alandd | 08/09/07
You are 100% Spot On!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/10/07
In yours and Microsoft's dreams!  Ole Man | 08/10/07
Co-existance..  russell@... | 08/10/07
Doesn't make any sense!  Ole Man | 08/10/07
Stallman, GPL and the long term health of Open Source  oldsysprog | 08/10/07
That's a lot of interesting accusations.  odubtaig | 08/10/07
Interesting sources  oldsysprog | 08/10/07
developer's discretion....  nbjayme | 08/11/07
Indiscretion by developers  oldsysprog | 08/11/07
IPR...  nbjayme | 08/11/07
Let your issues be sorted out in court.  nbjayme | 08/11/07
Interoperability??  Update victim | 08/11/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here