On TechRepublic: 12 tech terms that make you sound old
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 13:
Next »
Hasn't been
any problem since the advent of first using the transmissions at the begining of the Internet.There has been generations now of utility of transmission of copyrighted material,where the fact is still the description of fair use',in copyright law.

Thing about the situation is in a country with a consitution of 'free speech. It is only 'heard if it is copyrighted.Or it is said that it is somehow renagade. In a country with freedom of gathering,a copyrighted item can not be considered as part of that gathering.Only as the pulpit of it.

Copyrights do not describe the rights of publication.It describes the rights of authors,where then business law includes the rest of most rhetoric about the relationships of copyright and the public.

Copyright does not describe the public,of wich 'fair-use is supposedly a definition."Fair-use,only describes fair copyright,in wich the copyright is the relationship in the letter of the law.

If there is any description of copyright transmission,is should be described via law in terms of communications. Where 'fair-use can be descriptive beyond what is known in copyright.

Fact is that copyrighted material 'will be copied and transmitted.Problem is the persons dealing with the ideal cannot hear the relevence of wich this is concerned to authors in detail of copyright.Since there is not a discription of standards within copyright detailing this 'right".

When description is a consortium of publications,that in the mechanical function also cannot 'hear",.That this is a right.Specifically when the diversion is the premise of 'piracy,and crime,and law in place of a needed specification within copyright.

You've got bankers,and financiers looking at the formulas in evaluating their spread sheets.When the truth and fact is that ANY value,is the authors through copyright.The advantage of manufacture without cost is theirs-in any stead of mechanical relationship the copyright holder wishes to portray.The value is an asset that is being 'levied" against copyright. Wich authors cannot seem to position to realize.

A standard is needed that is equal to what the public expects of copyright.Within copyright.Not within a technology.Or a publication.For example DMCA describes only the right to a 'lock'for a copyrighted item in technological curcumstance.But it does not describe the relationship of wich that lock is a consideration of the copyright holder,over the technology wich makes it so.Or the relationship of the advantage of the copyright over the publication in a right to do so.

There would rather be the superlatives in piracy,and 'law,than the relavence of the standard in copyright of wich author sets the relationship of that standard.

These are groups of artists,and publishers,and 'copyright holders.The copyright themselves have nothing in common.Yet the public has a right to compete to something better.Where there is such a conflict in the communicative scenario w/o reference of law for the same standards supposedly known to the same public wich much be detailed of it.


Authors have a right to 'free copy.But where is the standard that details it.When the 'royalty,is the same.? Then copyright is suppose to represent the same person.But represents suedo relationships outside of what it maintains to be true.?

Telling that the public is somehow less of criteria for communications than something copyright cannot describe.?

Is new. Cannot 'hear'of it. Copyrighted,AND Free copy ?
With a communications conduit that is MODERN fair-use.
Posted by: ParadigmOdyssey   Posted on: 06/05/07 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Hasn't been  ParadigmOdyssey | 06/05/07
I don't know, I think there are simpler solutions.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/05/07
It isn't that easy.  coverlt@... | 06/06/07
Doesn't matter.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/06/07
That isn't the same thing  coverlt@... | 06/06/07
Daunting task  yyuko@... | 06/06/07
Now with all the "REAL" problems this nation faces  Laff | 06/06/07
Some things that about this article...  lenohere | 06/06/07
hurt to help???  jjarman | 06/06/07
No it's not enough that  Linux User 147560 | 06/06/07
Waving a magic wand?  RS9 | 06/06/07
Fine and dandy  Freebird54 | 06/06/07
More like Politicos who's members include big business  Boot_Agnostic | 06/07/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Enterprise Applications

  • Check out some of the easiest and most powerful ways to boost productivity while saving money on your application infrastructure. See ZDNet's comprehensive Enterprise Application resource center, now!
  • New Online Dashboard
  • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline