On UrbanBaby: Working Mother Confession
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 33 of 117:
Next »
« Previous
Valuation
t's an economic fallacy to compare the cost of software to the price of developers. Software's value doesn't derive from the code it derives from the job it does. The more critical the application, the more the supporting developer is worth.

Okay, how does one value the job something does? There simply is NO OBJECTIVE STANDARD of valuation. Valuation is based on whatever people are willing to pay. If they are convinced they should pay a lot, then they pay a lot. If not, they pay less.

Computers are immeasurably important to modern business. That does not mean, however, that businesses MUST pay more for software. Value is due to a number of factors, but I would think that a widespread willingness among developers to create COST-FREE product MUST affect the perception of value held by companies.

Trying to compare a mind share industry to smoke stack manufacturing is going to lead to some erroneous conclusions. And tying the cost of the developer to the cost of the software is one of them.

Why? I've given you a number of examples where it's clear that developer income is linked to the cost of the base product. The manner in which people apply value to something holds in all cases. In the realm of software, though, PERCEPTION is even more important, simply because there is nothing beyond the value of human labor that limits how low a price can go.

You can scream against the wind all you want but that isn't going to stop a hurricane.

Frankly, I'm not worried about open source taking over the software market anytime soon, because software evolves so quickly that the incentives created by proprietary software development will always manage to keep ahead of open source competition. Open source might make it harder dependent on the ardor felt among open source revolutionaries, but I have trouble seeing them matching innovation for innovation.

That doesn't mean, though, that open source might not cause some problems. Religion has a tendency to override common sense. I just don't think that they will prove the end of the proprietary software market so long as customers value features and cutting edge technology.

Oracle DBA's don't necessarily command a higher price because Oracle is expensive but because many companies run their critical accounting applications on Oracle based systems.

That simply isn't how valuation happens. People don't sit down and think about how important a piece of software is and decide to pay in proportion to that.
Posted by: John Carroll   Posted on: 05/19/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Economics of OSS shift costs to the integration side (increased investment)  oldskool | 05/19/04
repost (dang zd forum SW sux).  oldskool | 05/19/04
But can you eat your cake and have it too?  Patrick Jones | 05/19/04
Wasn't that the Unabomber construction?  John Carroll ZDNet Moderator | 05/19/04
Cake (way off topic)  Patrick Jones | 05/19/04
Flawed Analogies and assumptions  Tim Patterson | 05/19/04
Some clarification  John Carroll ZDNet Moderator | 05/19/04
Gatekeepers and admission costs  Robert Crocker | 05/19/04
Costs  John Carroll ZDNet Moderator | 05/19/04
Huh?  Robert Crocker | 05/20/04
OSS allows more innovation...here's how.  techboy_z | 05/19/04
Did you notice you called OpenOffice more innovative?  Anton Philidor | 05/19/04
You might look at OO's drawing capabilities  j.m.galvin | 05/19/04
When They Have A Package Like Office Pro  JimSatterfieldW | 05/21/04
Problems  John Carroll ZDNet Moderator | 05/19/04
Telling the true  theo_durcan | 05/19/04
Competition  John Carroll ZDNet Moderator | 05/19/04
You Are Mistaken  P. Douglas | 05/19/04
A matter of degree  Tim Patterson | 05/19/04
Re: A matter of degree  John Carroll ZDNet Moderator | 05/19/04
Need is the incentive  voska | 05/19/04
You agree, no price advantage for open source.  Anton Philidor | 05/19/04
Absolutely is a price advantage  Tim Patterson | 05/19/04
But there is a price advantage.  el1jones | 05/19/04
Costs add up.  Anton Philidor | 05/19/04
re: Costs add up  Iain_Peters | 05/19/04
Because you agree to help.  Anton Philidor | 05/19/04
Keeping programmers as pets  Anton Philidor | 05/19/04
why innovate?  ryusen | 05/19/04
Need, not money  Anton Philidor | 05/19/04
actually  ryusen | 05/19/04
Apples and Oranges  Chad_z | 05/19/04
Valuation  John Carroll ZDNet Moderator | 05/19/04
Why don't the usual rules for salaries apply?  Anton Philidor | 05/19/04
Regarding Salaries  John Carroll ZDNet Moderator | 05/19/04
What makes perception special here?  Anton Philidor | 05/19/04
Wrong quote; let's try the one about salaries.  Anton Philidor | 05/19/04
You can't compare physical objects to software...  Robert Crocker | 05/19/04
You have a flawed understanding of the software  StorageGuru | 05/19/04
That was amusing  Robert Crocker | 05/19/04
Are you nuts ?  JJ_z | 05/19/04
Not nuts, just looking elsewhere  Robert Crocker | 05/19/04
You have a gap in your education, Crocker!  Bill Weisgerber | 05/19/04
You are missing the point, Weisgerber!  Taz_z | 05/19/04
Another one who only reads the linus line!  Bill Weisgerber | 05/19/04
Thanks for your "learned" input  Robert Crocker | 05/19/04
You still have to download it  voska | 05/19/04
Do you really understands the different types of software products ?  JJ_z | 05/19/04
To a certain extent, you're right  John Carroll ZDNet Moderator | 05/19/04
But where is the incentive?  Robert Crocker | 05/19/04
I can ignore software lies, but not the cheese market, too!  techboy_z | 05/19/04
Demand for programming  Anton Philidor | 05/19/04
Exactly, almost  StorageGuru | 05/19/04
Agreed, but you're talking products OSS won't match  Anton Philidor | 05/19/04
Almost..  Patrick Jones | 05/19/04
Good point !  mbraincell@... | 05/19/04
Not exactly...  Patrick Jones | 05/19/04
This is funny.  mbraincell@... | 05/19/04
Partially..  Patrick Jones | 05/19/04
Maxed out market  John Carroll ZDNet Moderator | 05/19/04
Hey, ya wanna buy some software?  Anton Philidor | 05/19/04
And...  John Carroll ZDNet Moderator | 05/19/04
Let's turn that on it's head.  Robert Crocker | 05/20/04
I've said it before, John  bidemytime | 05/19/04
If Ifs and ands were pots and pans....  StorageGuru | 05/19/04
Indeed  bidemytime | 05/19/04
Patronage  techboy_z | 05/19/04
Working as a programmer  John Carroll ZDNet Moderator | 05/19/04
Re: Patronage  John L. Ries | 05/20/04
John, the slow-changing core is valuable.  Anton Philidor | 05/19/04
Core  Patrick Jones | 05/19/04
Models for software and selling  Anton Philidor | 05/19/04
Shoes, ships and sealing wax...  Patrick Jones | 05/19/04
MS "gives away" the Mac version of IE & Outlook Express  j.m.galvin | 05/19/04
Seems unlikely Microsoft is giving gifts...  Anton Philidor | 05/19/04
Nope  j.m.galvin | 05/19/04
You know there was a reason for that, right?  voska | 05/20/04
Regarding Apple and Linux  Robert Crocker | 05/20/04
Regarding open sourcing the core  John Carroll ZDNet Moderator | 05/19/04
Looking at all those limits...  Anton Philidor | 05/19/04
Hmmm, what happens when computers are "self programming"?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/19/04
Systems Analysts will rule again. :-D  Robert Crocker | 05/19/04
Agreed  Patrick Jones | 05/19/04
They walk the halls.  Anton Philidor | 05/19/04
Funny.  Patrick Jones | 05/19/04
Life with Fodder  Anton Philidor | 05/19/04
never worked in power plant have you?  voska | 05/19/04
Depends on the color of their shirt.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/19/04
Quite some distance away  voska | 05/19/04
I think the real key is a BIO chip.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/19/04
Is this the same BIO chip  voska | 05/20/04
Good point  John Carroll ZDNet Moderator | 05/19/04
Big business in damaged hard drives actually  voska | 05/20/04
AI Programming is...  John Le'Brecage | 05/19/04
AI Programming is...  seosamh_z | 05/20/04
They tried that - it was the failure of shrinkwrap SW - led to outsourcing  oldskool | 05/19/04
They tried that - it was the failure of shrinkwrap SW - led to outsourcing  seosamh_z | 05/20/04
Socialized Software  P. Douglas | 05/19/04
I don't htink that's true  NemesisNL | 05/20/04
soem comments  ryusen | 05/19/04
How about the samples?  StorageGuru | 05/19/04
About the $2,000 coat...  Robert Crocker | 05/19/04
Re: About...  John Carroll ZDNet Moderator | 05/19/04
The coat is raw material to feed the tailor and shoemaker  oldskool | 05/19/04
A question of generation, perhaps?  John Le'Brecage | 05/19/04
Formatting for Talkback  Robert Crocker | 05/20/04
Thanks! Was stymied by that  maxo_z | 05/21/04
truth is MS can drop prices and still compete with OSS  oldskool | 05/19/04
truth is MS can drop prices and still compete with OSS  seosamh_z | 05/20/04
False assumtion I: "FREE" software  theo_durcan | 05/19/04
Free Software  azurensis | 05/20/04
The cost of DB sure does matter  voska | 05/20/04
MS access?  NemesisNL | 05/24/04
ehm  NemesisNL | 05/20/04
Not much to argue about  John L. Ries | 05/20/04
I've long advocated a hybrid model for open source software companies  scroisier | 05/21/04
Pricing pressure due to free software  mr.pragmatic | 05/21/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

SmartPlanet

Click Here