On mySimon: Bose Mobile In-Ear Headset
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 14 of 19:
Next »
« Previous
May 18, 1994? Who came up with that date?
Let's see, Judge Jackson's Findings of Fact (upon which, together with the Conclusions of Law, all these class actions are based on) was written in 1999. He said they were a monopoly. Nowhere did he say *when* they became a monopoly. Certainly he didn't pinpoint May 18, 1994. So who came up with that date?

And why does it extend to June 30, 2006? Was Microsoft still abusing its monopoly then, years after the antitrust settlement?
Posted by: PB_z   Posted on: 02/14/07 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Not surprised  John L. Ries | 02/14/07
Right, but a real shame  Richard Flude | 02/14/07
HTF??  BlackDiamond | 02/14/07
State and the LAWYERS  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/14/07
MS didn't have to settle  John L. Ries | 02/15/07
Darn I was looking forward to Ballmer/ Gates testimony  mighetto | 02/14/07
Yes, but we can look on the bright side  GuidingLight | 02/14/07
deferred prosecution  mighetto | 02/16/07
And in the end, the only benefits  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/14/07
All antitrust laws must die [nt]  Omch'Ar | 02/14/07
Carthage must be destroyed  John L. Ries | 02/15/07
Why is that?  John Zern | 02/15/07
You misread his slogan  John L. Ries | 02/15/07
May 18, 1994? Who came up with that date?  PB_z | 02/14/07
Not sure, but  DarbyOhara | 02/14/07
The abuse is continuing  Richard Flude | 02/14/07
Apple  Boot_Agnostic | 02/15/07
But, they had choice! (free software)  awitbr@... | 02/15/07
I read the complaint how unfounded  DonBurnett | 03/07/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here