On The Insider: Clint Eastwood Earns Honor
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 8 of 13:
Next »
« Previous
Who are you again????
"The newspapers were doing themselves a disservice, Ruhland added. "They won a legal victory for now but maybe not in the long term," he said. "In 2007, if you are not findable in Google, you might as well not exist for practical purposes."

Quote pretty much sums it all up to a tee. If they do not want people to read part of their information to get people to go to their site, Block them out all together. Non-existance for those in this case would definitely be a good thing.
Posted by: lenohere   Posted on: 02/14/07 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Google suffers setback in copyright case  Loverock Davidson | 02/13/07
Applies across the board  tic swayback | 02/13/07
Thats funny  Loverock Davidson | 02/14/07
Double huh?  tic swayback | 02/14/07
Don't feed the trolls  voska | 02/14/07
Shooting yourself in the foot  tic swayback | 02/13/07
Be on Google  sriganesh.r | 02/13/07
Who are you again????  lenohere | 02/14/07
Google is what Google is  cchipman78704 | 02/14/07
Just morons looking for deep pockets  Cayble | 02/15/07
Google needs the content as much the provider needs the traffic  rotvic | 02/14/07
I totally agree  gattox | 02/15/07
Symbiotic relationship  tony@... | 02/15/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement