On TechRepublic: Why Linux will triumph over Windows
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 27 of 66:
Next »
« Previous
Let me annoy you some more then.
It amazes me that you actually believe this is about protection. If this administration was and is so concerned about our protection and safety, then tell me why they ignored all the warnings that led up to 9/11? Tell me why they invaded another country that has had nothing to do with AlQueda or 9/11. Tell me why Osama Bin Laden is still alive? Tell me why they allowed Osama Bin Laden to escape at Tora Bora? True, our founding fathers did give us many freedoms and liberties. They also created a constitution and a bill of rights to ensure those freedoms and liberties. In times such as these its even more important that those freedoms and liberties be protected. See, here's the problem. The administration along with the media has people so scared that we're going to be "standing on a pile of rubble", that the people of this country have allowed this government to do whatever it wants, and even agrees to the constitution being ignored. It's total BS people. The laws on the books give our government more than enough ability to do what is needed to bring terrorist organizations down without a need to break the constitution or laws to do so.

Yes, our founding fathers did a wonderful thing. It's a shame that those who want to destroy that would rather blame us who want to protect it as being unpatriotic. Who is more unpatriotic? The man who loves his country, sees something amiss and strives to do something, or the man who loves his country and turns a blind eye to anything thats wrong with it thereby allowing its government to break laws that this country was built on.

Finally, I know its hard for conservative thinkers who have a real hard time sticking to the argument when they actually have none, but I don't appreciate your implication that I use the internet to surf for porn of chatting with someone other than my spouse. Not that I would have to answer to you if I did, but I do neither of those and have been happily married for over 30 years. Try to keep the discussion on its merits. It makes you look like an idiot and cheapens the discussion when you make stupid comments such as that.
Posted by: bedece1@...   Posted on: 01/31/07 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

ISP should be in charge of any data interception  thetruth_z | 01/30/07
FBI BROAD NEW WIRETAP  DONTXO | 01/30/07
F.B.I and Back ground checks  maheshmaddur | 01/30/07
Does this mean SPAM will be eliminated???  mespe | 01/30/07
WW III  SinjinNY | 01/30/07
They are rationaing. They are rationing  HypnoToad72 | 01/30/07
U.S. Constitution Amendment, Article IV.  Dr_Zinj | 01/30/07
it's clear this administration has NO respect for the constitution (nt)  jmelnik | 01/03/08
U.S. Constitution Amendment, Article IV.  ron4598@... | 01/03/08
That's one part  maldain | 01/03/08
Aw man! I thought the new ipod nano colors article was more important!  HypnoToad72 | 01/30/07
No more privacy...  MD525 | 01/30/07
Message has been deleted.  Apple ipod | 04/17/07
sad  Altotus | 01/07/08
Depends - there is no broad prohibition as you imply  Takalok | 01/30/07
Re: Depends  brianh123 | 01/30/07
THANK YOU for the link to  btljooz | 01/31/07
Yes, but  mecormany@... | 02/09/07
um, no... I suggest you actually read the constitution  jmelnik | 01/03/08
emails versus browsing versus telephone calls  bradgates | 01/30/07
NEWT  Sunshine48 | 01/30/07
Use this proxy NOW  919owner | 01/30/07
New Wiretap Method  ozland | 01/31/07
Our founding fathers would be apalled  bedece1@... | 01/31/07
Bet out the Kleenex  ozland | 01/31/07
Amen...  critique | 01/31/07
Let me annoy you some more then.  bedece1@... | 01/31/07
oh boy....  critique | 01/31/07
Give me a break.  bedece1@... | 01/31/07
LOL!  critique | 01/31/07
AMEN!!! bedece1, thank God 4 ppl like u!  btljooz | 01/31/07
bedece1@ Has got it Every one else that disagrees  johnpall@... | 12/28/07
bedece1@ Has got it Every one else that disagrees  johnpall@... | 12/28/07
I'm with you, bedece1  TranMan | 01/03/08
You've got to be kidding.... wake the hell up  jmelnik | 01/03/08
and I'll laugh my @ss off....  jmelnik | 01/03/08
On another note...  critique | 01/31/07
We can agree on that  bedece1@... | 01/31/07
big +++++ to reading the federalist papers....  jmelnik | 01/03/08
BRAVO bedece1  mecormany@... | 02/09/07
bravo! (nt)  jmelnik | 01/03/08
RE:New Wiretap Method  FGENT1110@... | 01/03/08
pathetic  jmelnik | 01/03/08
Sorry oz  maldain | 01/03/08
Sorry man....  critique | 01/31/07
Response to Sorry man..  ozland | 01/31/07
Let's think this through...  smdunn | 02/05/07
Actually, snail mail is private  maldain | 01/03/08
Oh yeah....  critique | 01/31/07
reply from an ultra-lib tard  mecormany@... | 02/09/07
Actually, that is exactly what is happening  maldain | 01/03/08
INTERNET "CALLER" ID  ERNIE3 | 02/01/07
FBI turns to broad new wiretap method  mSn mSN | 02/09/07
yep!  smdunn | 02/10/07
Every year we give up more and more freedom  treyedean | 02/10/07
Well the list is too long...  mikifinaz1@... | 12/27/07
A SHEEPISH NO LIFE NERD !  boogie2277@... | 12/29/07
Land of the free  bstreet | 01/03/08
I am honestly beginning to agree  Leria | 01/03/08
RE: FBI turns to broad new wiretap method  madrucke@... | 01/03/08
Great Bumper Sticker  phughes3 | 01/03/08
it is immoral to circumvent the law trying to enforce the law  Hobyx | 01/03/08
RE: FBI turns to broad new wiretap method  kkinge@... | 01/05/08
How many of you have even READ ...  Media-Ted@... | 01/06/08
RE: FBI turns to broad new wiretap method  don1185@... | 01/06/08
Not stock  Altotus | 01/07/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement