On TV.com: ALYSSA MILANO is Headed to Castle
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 3 of 124:
Next »
« Previous
Don't you mean will stifle COPYING.
And you can take the copyright crap and shove it, it's useless when talking about code!
Posted by: No_Ax_to_Grind   Posted on: 11/28/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

This might help, but patents will still stifle inovation.  DonnieBoy | 11/28/06
Hear Hear !  htotten | 11/28/06
Don't you mean will stifle COPYING.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/28/06
Copyright, Copying...  BanjoPaterson | 11/29/06
Intellectual property? An obscure idea in it self.  holst.g@... | 11/29/06
Print authors beg  Too Old For IT | 11/29/06
On the contrary ...  mwagner@... | 12/01/06
So will this effect McDonalds  RIAAsucks | 11/28/06
Get Your Facts Straight  Tiquor | 11/28/06
I'm not sure that helps...  John L. Ries | 11/28/06
That's the same thing  voska | 11/28/06
Talk about obviousness  reddtigger | 11/28/06
I agree  clockmendergb@... | 11/28/06
NTP to patent the sandwhich  Too Old For IT | 11/29/06
No it isn't.  osreinstall | 11/28/06
So, if I make a sandwich the same way....  smoring | 11/29/06
Still don't get it.  osreinstall | 11/29/06
Yeah right  voska | 11/29/06
Never that desperate  osreinstall | 11/29/06
Here's how I see it  voska | 11/29/06
And this is how I see it.  osreinstall | 11/29/06
Reinstall. Why do you do this?  Logics | 11/29/06
Because I want to.  osreinstall | 11/30/06
Wrong focus  voska | 11/29/06
You really don't understand patents.  osreinstall | 11/29/06
Poor reading skills manybe?  voska | 11/29/06
Poor spelling skills  osreinstall | 11/29/06
You should learn to read posts before posting.  Logics | 11/29/06
You should think before posting.  osreinstall | 11/30/06
Trade Secrets; Copyright; NDA; Non Compete  mighetto | 11/28/06
Non Compete and other items  jjmcdonald7911@... | 11/29/06
Funny but...  Logics | 11/29/06
The Supremes  Too Old For IT | 11/29/06
This is obvious  jsjag1 | 11/28/06
Excellent idea  frgough | 11/28/06
Doesn't work.  Anton Philidor | 11/28/06
Yours doesn't either  Harrim | 11/28/06
Your code does the same thing.  Anton Philidor | 11/28/06
I disagree  voska | 11/28/06
So let's say...  Anton Philidor | 11/28/06
Anton - you want to have to have your cake and eat it....  bportlock | 11/29/06
Um that's capitolism  voska | 11/29/06
Open Office  Anton Philidor | 11/29/06
You have to DO something with your idea to copyright it.  Too Old For IT | 11/29/06
Re: Doesn't work.  none none | 11/28/06
Congress used a word...  Anton Philidor | 11/28/06
Your definition with the caveat...  Anton Philidor | 11/28/06
Re: Your definition with the caveat...  none none | 11/28/06
Herein lies the problem!  Logics | 11/30/06
Copyright instead of Patent?  metajohn@... | 11/28/06
But where does it stop?  A.Sinic | 11/29/06
Just my opinion  voska | 11/29/06
Wow all the techies got a bit touchy  jsjag1 | 11/29/06
if patents and copyrights foster genius, where is Mozart?  ionbidon@... | 11/28/06
Get informed  frgough | 11/28/06
Really?  Langalibalene | 11/28/06
"Marxists", huh?  John L. Ries | 11/28/06
Health insurance is a scam  reddtigger | 11/28/06
Responded in the wrong place  John L. Ries | 11/28/06
What?  jsjag1 | 11/29/06
Use some logic  voska | 11/29/06
Wishing he could still get royalties...  Anton Philidor | 11/28/06
Think you missed the point  voska | 11/28/06
Music before Copyright  A.Sinic | 11/29/06
How's that any different from today  voska | 11/29/06
Mozart is...  jt@... | 11/28/06
RE: Mozart is...  blaze1024 | 11/29/06
Dude, go talk to Edison...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/28/06
Hold on to your lug nuts...  Carrion | 11/28/06
My favorite Obvious patent...  astro_z | 11/28/06
Excellent find!!  Carrion | 11/28/06
Exercising a cat  jt@... | 11/28/06
how about a pie chart or training manual  RIAAsucks | 11/28/06
Re: My favorite Obvious patent...  none none | 11/28/06
If the beam is "invisible" how would the cat see it...  rgranger | 11/28/06
Obvious?  notsofast | 11/28/06
Great example  jsjag1 | 11/29/06
My Favorite  wkranitz@... | 11/29/06
Prior Art in third World countries....  Logics | 11/30/06
Patent law  bobwinners | 11/28/06
a test is necessary - yet loop holes must be plugged  chasster | 11/28/06
Is it novel, original? Do people in the field say ...  jt@... | 11/28/06
Aside from the Obvious after the fact....  Anton Philidor | 11/28/06
...but...  John L. Ries | 11/28/06
Laws of nature can't be patented.  Anton Philidor | 11/28/06
Never said they could  John L. Ries | 11/28/06
Jefferson was the first in charge...  Anton Philidor | 11/29/06
You're right, he was  John L. Ries | 11/29/06
Restrictions  Anton Philidor | 11/29/06
Re: Aside from the Obvious after the fact....  none none | 11/28/06
Patent system is broken  rjcarlson49 | 11/28/06
Another step towards ripping off Australia's CSIRO  YuridaMan | 11/28/06
Not really  osreinstall | 11/28/06
patent is the tech area is sick and distorded  Mectron | 11/28/06
yeah right  element13 | 11/28/06
Tackle more of the problem.  diane@... | 11/28/06
The Original Objective  JelMin | 11/28/06
Pardon me, this is not the task of the court.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/28/06
Court's Job - Interperet Laws  The-Bytemaster | 11/28/06
Interpret yes, make new law no,  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/28/06
Judges can't make new laws  voska | 11/29/06
In the US, unfortunately, they can.  Anton Philidor | 11/29/06
Be careful what you wish for  John L. Ries | 11/28/06
Regardless of outcome,  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/28/06
Then you think software patents in the US should never have existed  Edward Meyers | 11/29/06
No, I said it is up to Congress. Having reading problems?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/29/06
You have the reading problem  Edward Meyers | 11/29/06
In general, I agree  John L. Ries | 11/29/06
But of Course it is!  mejohnsn | 12/15/06
Supreme Court weighs 'obviousness' of patents  turnitup | 11/28/06
Possibly  John L. Ries | 11/28/06
Insurance forums  jsjag1 | 11/29/06
The original topic of the thread...  John L. Ries | 11/29/06
Obviousness in Patent Cases  mekhongkurt@... | 11/29/06
The Problem with Patents  voska | 11/29/06
GOOD  CobraA1 | 11/29/06
Patents: Obvious problems and solutions  frsharp@... | 11/29/06
Something amiss?  frsharp@... | 11/29/06
Supreme Court loves to pick battles of their 'liking'  Boot_Agnostic | 11/29/06
perpetual motion machine patents  brucewt | 11/30/06
I think in the USA, you can't patent perpetual motion machines anymore  CobraA1 | 12/03/06
Why have patents?  pcmag@... | 12/05/06
Spot the uncreative person in this picture...  DirkBelig | 12/09/06
Consumer Psychology  rpitty | 02/10/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement