On TV.com: New TV Sex Symbol: Vintage black PORSCHE
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 10 of 55:
Next »
« Previous
Airplanes
The problem with the Federal Circuit's test is that it produces (as it were) patently ludicrous results.

Example: XYZ Industries develops, and patents, a new aluminum alloy which is stronger and lighter than previous aluminum alloys.

Within weeks, the patent office is inundated with applications for patents on using the new XYZ alloy in aircraft, automobile engines, etc. -- anywhere that light weight and strength are called for and which previously used other aluminum alloys.

The aircraft (etc.) industry argue that any nitwit would know that strong, light aluminum alloys are useful in making planes, but the Court looks to the wording of the XYZ patent and finds that it doesn't mention aircraft. Countless patents upheld.

The next week, TUV Industries patents a carbon-fiber material that's lighter and stronger ...
Posted by: Yagotta B. Kidding   Posted on: 11/27/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

"I was thinking about it."  Anton Philidor | 11/27/06
I think it's obvious... we need...  el1jones | 11/27/06
The best patent examiners...  Anton Philidor | 11/27/06
Obvious?  earlkaplan@... | 11/27/06
IP property law depend on parties defending their rights against others  lamp299 | 02/21/07
I think that shouldn't be patentable  voska | 11/27/06
In any field...  Anton Philidor | 11/27/06
Thing is people have  voska | 11/27/06
I would say...  Patrick Jones | 11/27/06
Airplanes  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/27/06
Have to agree... spot on (nt)  el1jones | 11/27/06
But is that true???  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/27/06
However..  Patrick Jones | 11/27/06
Huh?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/27/06
That is the original point!  Patrick Jones | 11/28/06
Duh?  el1jones | 11/28/06
IP - should it be patentable  dhopp@... | 11/27/06
How about a 'tangible' test  l_g_johnson@... | 11/27/06
Ridiculous  wjkahlssmd@... | 11/27/06
i agree with your litmus test, but...  Been_Done_Before | 11/27/06
Are You A Programmer?  wjkahlssmd@... | 11/27/06
I think is was more a metaphore  John Zern | 11/27/06
I thought of that!!!!  wjkahlssmd@... | 11/27/06
as long as it's physical . . .  CobraA1 | 11/27/06
Unfair  SRipley | 11/27/06
Agreed  CobraA1 | 11/27/06
The iPOd???  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/27/06
They tried to patent their click wheel.  CobraA1 | 11/27/06
And oh, yeah . . .  CobraA1 | 11/27/06
Yes, it should...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/27/06
Re: Yes, it should...  none none | 11/27/06
The problem of "obvious" is "when".  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/27/06
There really is a simple solution to software patents.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/27/06
Re: There really is a simple solution to software patents.  none none | 11/27/06
There is no place for software patents  bitfuzzy | 11/27/06
agreed (nt)  CobraA1 | 11/27/06
The answer is obvious...  Ian Lewis | 11/27/06
valuable patent portfolio  Resuna | 11/27/06
Easy  Thore | 11/27/06
Obviousness  ESFabian | 11/27/06
Obviousness of Patents  stevem_001 | 11/27/06
Bogusoids gaming the system  NeutralityNow | 11/27/06
A reason stupid patents exist.  nm32help | 11/27/06
Patenting Software is like patenting math  davidsarmstrong | 11/27/06
Yes and no...  Allstar_z | 11/28/06
All patents must die [nt]  Omch'Ar | 11/27/06
Holy Smokes...  critique | 11/28/06
So a lab which develops a valuable idea...  Anton Philidor | 11/28/06
However..  Patrick Jones | 11/28/06
Thanks!  critique | 11/28/06
Ideas too important to patent?  Anton Philidor | 11/28/06
Woah Woah...  critique | 11/28/06
Oh Yeah....  critique | 11/28/06
I think we are being carried away by the "obviousness" test  lamp299 | 02/21/07
Freedom for the consumer  Dumber_z | 11/11/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here