On TechRepublic: 10 cool USB flash drive tricks
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 4 of 18:
Next »
« Previous
Supposing
the FCC was to take to refering to digital broadcasts 'wide area 'downloads"". With this it could then refer to everything 'downloaded 'legal,but 'uploading 'illegal.

With digital television what you really have is 'processed signaling. You have not only to grab the 'display,but you have to have the decoder box wich 'processes the signals (wich actually has the processor wich anolog tvs dont have).

Think about it,not only can digital signal 'broadcast over a wide area of geographic - but digital signal can 'program over a wide area of geography. Just because the receiver is 'procesing 'digital 'signal.

If it was that 'downloading was legal,but uploading was illegal,the devices that did so would be unlawful - thus the utility wich comes from record (or copy) would be a thing of the past,no person to deal with just the machine to blame in the cause of 'content owner.

Pretty strange to believe that you might have all these wonderful robots being run by TW,or AOL,or ABC,NBC,CBS - but .. this is a determination of YOUR configuration of course. The bigger the robot ,the better the bang for your digital experience.

__________

The FCC didn't question the fact that this actually violates the constitution through illegal search and seizure. The convenience of wich the cry of 'internet is to value your patient person Im sure isn't going to be a companion of reasonable patronage.

You can also notice the description of 'content,as it pertains to 'distribution hasn't considered to the byproduct of the 'digital facualty AS A UTILITY OF VALUE AMONG COMPETING COPYRIGHTED WORKS. It simply proceeds to neglect the competence of digital devices on the mark of a detail referenced to 'piracy,rather than a reference of wich 'distribution is actually its only owner.

The question of the 'public interest is premisquesly left to the functionality of the 'content provider. When if it where a vote (outside of the latest digital poll) the public interest would be squarely on keeping the functionality of the digital relationship to the exact same as that of an anolog relationship.

What we really dont know is just what the 'internet has to do with any of this. Except with the users of services wich actually send your viewing habits to the service provider within a nicely packaged no questions ask EULA.

For the portrayal of a 'digital recording being illegal - the FCC ,nor any other person (that was a person,and get this) has ever been shown within court to be illegaly recording 'broadcast when taking to the VCR. Subjectively here,then changing the subject of 'quality of digital pictures to be something that has anything to do with 'grabing a record(or copying a show) to view later. Wich incidently could easily be taken over to granmas house to look at.

What I can see is that by slapping all of this content wisdom on everybody - you couldn't pay in a lifetime for the cost of mere communication wich the digital qualification bear in visual,audio,and interactivity. By keeping the 'schooling in-house via the conceptual digital via hollywood,in place of the real digital conceptions the cost,array,and authorship of copyrighted digital products will remain something of which is based on that formulation. And it is only a necesity to its own end. Different persons altogether - perhaps 'broadcast is what is 'information service. But for what is digital since this is true there is no such thing as 'content. Specifically when the persons dont bear this out to practice.

Maybe because a happy robot is a 'real robot. We dont have to be concerned about it. Or not.

.just talking.
Posted by: ParadigmOdyssey   Posted on: 04/13/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Completley insane?  WildArmX2 | 04/13/04
No it hasn't.  James T. Kirk | 04/13/04
Internet Piracy....  DarbyOhara | 04/14/04
Supposing  ParadigmOdyssey | 04/13/04
Here's what I'm thinking  AbsolutelyNot | 04/13/04
what you're thinking is a given here...  DarbyOhara | 04/14/04
It's not the current administration  rpmyers1 | 04/14/04
exactly, it is  V Sanders | 04/15/04
Change is good  lhmjen | 04/13/04
doesn't matter  V Sanders | 04/15/04
Three things  Mack DaNife | 04/14/04
Spot on!!  NemesisNL | 04/18/04
aawwwwwww  V Sanders | 04/15/04
Is it even worth it  allshebe@... | 04/16/04
Its not worth it  scifirules@... | 04/16/04
true but.....  NemesisNL | 04/18/04
FCC has for years been off the road!  rquance | 04/16/04
lets just forget the digital revolution  V Sanders | 04/20/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Enterprise Applications

  • Check out some of the easiest and most powerful ways to boost productivity while saving money on your application infrastructure. See ZDNet's comprehensive Enterprise Application resource center, now!
  • New Online Dashboard
  • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline