On The Insider: Heidi Klum Takes Seal's Name
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 17 of 50:
Next »
« Previous
Distros are NOT Linux
No one is saying attack Linux, I am saying the other distros. There is a difference.

While we don't have the full wording of the agreement with Novell and MS, you can pretty much assume that like most patent agreements both parties agree to protect the "value" of the patents.

Novell could very well come to MS and say, "We had to give value for value to use your patents and demand that you require the same from the other distros". At that point Microsoft would have no choice but to file a suit against the distro.

Now, would Novell use the court system to their advantage like this? Ummm, yeah.
Posted by: No_Ax_to_Grind   Posted on: 11/05/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

M$ had merely changed the tactic  Linux Geek | 11/03/06
A wolf in sheep's clothing.  OldMarine | 11/06/06
Time for another anti-trust/rico action against M$  thetruth_z | 11/03/06
You have it exactlly backwards.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/03/06
Then you imagine "Judge KK" is an idiot.  Henry Miller | 11/04/06
Henry old fella, this is what she asked for  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/04/06
You really don't know much about trolling, do you  John Zern | 11/06/06
um  moebiusloop | 11/08/06
Basis for action?  rapson | 11/06/06
Microsoft would love to sue the pant off of open source companies, but they  DonnieBoy | 11/03/06
Competition  Linux User 1 | 11/03/06
What makes you think  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/03/06
For obvious reasons.  UserLand | 11/03/06
Message has been deleted.  B.O.F.H. | 11/03/06
Did you have a point?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/04/06
IBM would defend an attack against Linux ...  George Mitchell | 11/04/06
Distros are NOT Linux  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/05/06
Linux and IBM  Linux User 1 | 11/05/06
You are assuming that the other distros ...  George Mitchell | 11/05/06
he has a point  sjaaxken | 11/06/06
What about capping development?  Media-Ted@... | 11/06/06
And Linux companies would love to do the same  John Zern | 11/06/06
Xenix Lives On!  kevinclosson | 11/03/06
Not even speculation...  Anton Philidor | 11/03/06
But Novell IS paying MS ...  George Mitchell | 11/04/06
I wonder...  Anton Philidor | 11/06/06
Very good questions ...  George Mitchell | 11/06/06
All patent laws must die [nt]  Omch'Ar | 11/03/06
One thing for certain...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/03/06
Agreed ...  George Mitchell | 11/04/06
depends . . .  startx.jeff | 11/06/06
Hey! Just don't inhale the smoke they're blowing!  Media-Ted@... | 11/06/06
MS vs, The World  StanB | 11/04/06
Ummm, no  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/04/06
Re: Ummm, no  mKind | 11/06/06
Zenworks Patents? Defend Active Directory  jimcal80@... | 11/04/06
I think you hit closer to the center than anyone.  Media-Ted@... | 11/06/06
This is a good thing ... it is NOT a SCO redux ...  George Mitchell | 11/04/06
Well said  Aussie_Troll | 12/06/06
Trying to get their technology into Linux  Chad_z | 11/04/06
Indeed  Badgered | 11/06/06
Time to take the Patent Office to court  Boot_Agnostic | 11/05/06
naaa just find the person  bitfuzzy | 11/06/06
I suspect everything MS  bjbrock | 11/06/06
And that's it in a nutshell  John Zern | 11/06/06
Novell Doesnt seem to learn from their past  mrlinux | 11/06/06
I hope not  hoiatl | 11/06/06
The dragon has tried hard to wash the blood ...  Media-Ted@... | 11/06/06
Reputations  plumnilly | 11/07/06
IT's simply dealing with reality  hoiatl | 06/12/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here