On mySimon: Caddyshack Trivia Game
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 2 of 9:
Next »
« Previous
You Simply
cant have a privacy policy wich indemnifies a company of all liability,warranty,or responsibility of entered information. Or a privacy policy wich retains the idea of taking documentation of surfing habits, .

Its as simple as that.There can be no 'policy when there is simply indemnification of person of patronage,from person of x propriety.

This this is all wrong.Nobody has got any of it 'right. This is the simplest way to tell of what a privacy policy is. That when you tell a person of their 'privacy - you tell them to read a 'privacy policy,wich simply states x propriety can do what they want to do with browsing information in return for utilizing the facility.

In its best pretence it is the hypocritical side of person,and place in business.


-just talking...
Posted by: ParadigmOdyssey   Posted on: 03/29/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Hey, Amazon, pay attention  Chad_z | 03/29/04
You Simply  ParadigmOdyssey | 03/29/04
Time for feedback... but how?  RaySand | 03/31/04
MS PowerPoint template text + privacy  what_now2 | 04/01/04
Which "cookies" are anti-privacy?  what_now2 | 04/01/04
easy to turn off the majority  V Sanders | 04/01/04
Thx But.............  what_now2 | 04/03/04
we need to put all articles asking for email  V Sanders | 04/04/04
Lorem ipsum dolor sit  doggybuddy | 04/04/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement