On mySimon: Nike SB Eugene Backpack
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 17 of 18:
Next »
« Previous
Are you daft?
This kind of search has nothing to do with terrorism. Even in this talkback thread, there is the statement above that such search policy has been in effect for over 20 years, and is there because of drugs. Not terrorism.

It seems odd to have such a search, yes, but the fact is, the guy had some kind of record that caused Canada not to allow him into their country. Isn't there some reason to believe that someone who was refused entry to Canada might be worth searching on the off chance you'd turn something up?
Posted by: SteveS_z   Posted on: 07/27/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

WRONG!  Linux User 147560 | 07/26/06
Sorry, nothing you can do about it.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/27/06
Spoken Like A True Bushbot Sheep  itanalyst | 07/27/06
Making a big deal about something that's been in effect forever  j.m.galvin | 07/27/06
You are SO right  Shelendrea | 07/27/06
Sounds like Vista's BigLocker (full-volume encryption) is just on time  PB_z | 07/26/06
That or the PGP version  bitflippper1 | 07/27/06
You trust MSFT not to cooperate?  Chad_z | 07/27/06
The name of the feature is BitLocker and ...  ShadeTree | 07/27/06
Be careful what you wish for  j.m.galvin | 07/27/06
Didn't I just read  Roger Ramjet | 07/27/06
What we need then  Michael Kelly | 07/27/06
Not like that  j.m.galvin | 07/27/06
You are owned by the government  Protector | 07/27/06
WTF?  Shelendrea | 07/27/06
The Terrorists Have Won  BlackDiamond | 07/27/06
Are you daft?  SteveS_z | 07/27/06
Not drugs - Everything  j.m.galvin | 07/27/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Meet Doc