On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 2 of 12:
Next »
« Previous
Important case
This is an important case. Take your statement "If you don't want your content copied, saved or cached THEN DON'T PUBLISH IT." Does that apply to publishing books, magazines or newspapers? If a magazine publisher doesn't want other people to copy their magazines, he shouldn't publish the magazine at all?

The *end consumer* has certain "fair use" rights, perhaps to make a photocopy of a magazine article he read. But does a magazine stand have a right to make photocopies of magazine articles and present its customers with those photocopies? I'd say the answer is no, they don't.

In my opinion, Google News falls into the "magazine stand" category. They certainly are not the end user. This lawsuit is seeking to clarify whether the particular medium being a third-party (google)'s internet server makes a difference in terms of copyright law. It's a very important case.
Posted by: PB_z   Posted on: 07/18/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Dumber than microsoft? AMAZING.  yogeee | 07/18/06
Important case  PB_z | 07/18/06
Yeah, I can see the validity of THAT comparison....  yogeee | 07/18/06
Talk about flawed logic....  yogeee | 07/18/06
YOU can, but Google cannot  PB_z | 07/19/06
you'd be walking a thin line  John Zern | 07/19/06
Copyright's gonna hang itself one day.  HypnoToad | 07/18/06
Here's what google can do.  PhantomX | 07/19/06
Yes but then  DemonX | 07/19/06
Good  tic swayback | 07/19/06
Bloggers have nothing to fear.  krazytechie | 07/19/06
I want a court of law to say that  tic swayback | 07/19/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here