On CBS MoneyWatch: The perfect car for a teenager
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 2 of 57:
Next »
« Previous
That's because it was a sham to quiet the public...
...and make them think that justice was being done. It's just another Warren report: a public undertaking to fool the masses into thinking that a thorough investifation was being conducted when in reality nothing was being done.
And for all the sorry M$ shills that think Microsoft never broke any laws and can do no wrong, let me just point to a mere few crimes they committed:

"The most interesting section of the decision is the discussion regarding Microsoft's undermining of consistent standards for the software language Java.
Microsoft set out to create a rival, incompatible Java standard.
the Court declared that in Microsoft's case the company pursued its alternative standard through deception and exclusionary deals with developers for the explicit goal of economic power rather than superior design. That behavior is a violation of the antitrust law"

"By cutting deals with computer manufacturers and Internet Service Providers to exclude the Netscape browser from distribution, the Appeals Court ruled, "Microsoft's agreements foreclosed a substantial portion of the field for JVM distribution and because, in so doing, they protected Microsoft's monopoly from a middle-ware threat, they are anti-competitive."

"the Appeals Court also found that Microsoft had flat-out lied to software developers by encouraging them unknowingly to develop Java software programs for Windows that were incompatible with the original standards developed for the language"

"Beyond anti-competitive deals and deceit, the Appeals Court accused Microsoft of undermining Java and innovation through straight-up intimidation and threats. Back in 1995, Intel was in the process of developing a high- performance Windows-compatible computer chip that would make the original Java standards run extremely fast and efficiently. Microsoft warned Intel that unless it abandoned those efforts, Microsoft might work with rival chip makers to hurt Intel."

http://www.commondreams.org/views01/0709-09.htm

Try to debunk these tidbits, you dignified sheep..
Posted by: Bobby Sskcat   Posted on: 03/09/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

i don't understand the antitrust settlement  snsh | 03/09/04
That's because it was a sham to quiet the public...  Bobby Sskcat | 03/09/04
You have cause and effect mixed up.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/09/04
Give up the shilling please  Bobby Sskcat | 03/09/04
Wrong  AxleMunshine | 03/10/04
but maybe  JWatson77 | 03/11/04
Then ...  Ardian Daka | 03/11/04
It not about what the consumer wants  voska | 03/09/04
no-axe NO ONE SAID ANYTHING ABOUT LINUX  JWatson77 | 03/11/04
How's life in MSFT PR tonight, No_Ax?  Chad_z | 03/12/04
.NOT?  DavidAyres | 03/15/04
because  JWatson77 | 03/11/04
and then  eLurker | 03/11/04
not that simple  JWatson77 | 03/15/04
the bigger question is  JWatson77 | 03/15/04
This is total hogwash  Mike Cox | 03/09/04
I Know Where You're Coming From, Dude  BanjoPaterson | 03/09/04
You guys are too much.  Mack DaNife | 03/10/04
if this were the case  JWatson77 | 03/15/04
It is hard to believe that ZDNet would publish this  mlindl | 03/09/04
It is hard...  andy2lisa | 03/09/04
Help your children save time  tic swayback | 03/09/04
minutes  pschroeder@... | 03/09/04
Or maybe..  Bobby Sskcat | 03/09/04
sheesh... calm down dude  ryusen | 03/09/04
and...  pschroeder@... | 03/09/04
WHATEVER Pete  Bobby Sskcat | 03/09/04
Really?  Confused by religion | 03/09/04
Sure  Bobby Sskcat | 03/09/04
Wow, you're such a nice guy.  DavidAyres | 03/15/04
Save time  acetroubleshooter | 03/12/04
Difficult to Create a LAN with XP?  gsquared | 03/10/04
good story bob  nbroot | 03/09/04
Someone lend this man a clue.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/09/04
Great comments!!!  Anton Philidor | 03/10/04
There was only one person...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/10/04
say it ain't so  eLurker | 03/10/04
Not this time, I think.  Anton Philidor | 03/12/04
Exactly..now ZDNet is censoring legitimate posts  Bobby Sskcat | 03/10/04
MS Defenders  Nullifidian | 03/09/04
MS Defenders  Grolan | 03/10/04
don't forget the detractors  CO_TechGuy | 03/10/04
Careful  Chad_z | 03/12/04
trolls sit on BOTH sides (nt)  ryusen | 03/10/04
They cant...  Tammee | 03/11/04
True  DavidAyres | 03/15/04
The point is  ParadigmOdyssey | 03/09/04
Monopolies are rarely celebrated  Sunny Jalolly | 03/09/04
Good post Sunny!  Bobby Sskcat | 03/09/04
That's ridiculous. I'm glad your disguise has been penetrated.  Linux_Developer | 06/08/04
Yes, but what about the games?!?  DavidAyres | 03/15/04
Funny, since it came from an IBM sheep locked in the past...  AxleMunshine | 03/10/04
AS400/iSeries head of the pack, the rest are playing catch-up  steelville@... | 03/13/04
What???  Gib Yroc | 03/10/04
i say neither  JWatson77 | 03/11/04
why do we have to click on at least one talkback  JWatson77 | 03/11/04
Absolutely  mbsvar | 03/16/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Meet Doc