On mySimon: Deadwood - The Complete Series
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 43 of 65:
Next »
« Previous
wrong wrong wrong (as usual)
The topic is the EOLAS patent and how the patent office is responding to the W3C challenge to it (yes, MS is a part, but only a part, although they have the most to gain right now).

You brought the MS antitrust case, the DOJ settlement, and the politics surrounding it into this with your post. It had nothing to do with this case, with the exception that "Microsoft" was involved in both.

The Eolas patent should have never been issued because it was overly broad and covered a topic that was already represented by much prior art. It really has nothing to do with MS or IE; they were just the (first) target because of their deep pockets. I reason the patent needs to be revoked for the same reason the W3C, Sun, Opera, Nokia, the Patent Office, and the majority of the industry does; because it should never have been issued in the first place. Your reasoning that this is all about MS and IE and that is why the patent should be upheld is what is flawed.

Let me steer you in the right direction:
http://www.w3.org/2003/09/public-faq
Play close attention to the W3C's position on this and who the MEMBERS of the special commision appointed to deal with it are. Strange bedfellows, no?

The patent office, while part of the government, is NOT a part that changes depending on who is in political office. The people don't change and the policies certainly don't. It isn't under the purview of the executive branch. Therefore, it has nothing to do with the Bush administration or any past or future one.

SS? This is your new nick, isn't it? Still shilling for Microsoft by attempting to make Linux/OSS folks look like fringe lunatics, I see. Naive, young, or simply not what you are purporting to be. Time to start ignoring you again.
Posted by: pschroeder@...   Posted on: 03/06/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

To bad the courts cant act this fast in other cases.(nt)  nite_w0lf | 03/05/04
I was thinking same thing  JWatson77 | 03/06/04
except  pschroeder@... | 03/06/04
The PATENT OFFICE is not a court.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/06/04
Microsoft is not a court either..  Bobby Sskcat | 03/06/04
Settlement  richhayes | 03/06/04
Simple.  systemcleaner | 03/07/04
Bribes  richhayes | 03/07/04
Yes, bribes.  systemcleaner | 03/07/04
Yes, bribes.  systemcleaner | 03/07/04
Yes, bribes.  systemcleaner | 03/07/04
Any evidence?  BruceWheelock@... | 03/07/04
re: Yes Bribes...  Wolfie2K3 | 03/08/04
arrogance  CO_TechGuy | 03/08/04
this is a welcome step in the right direction  pschroeder@... | 03/05/04
i agree completely  ryusen | 03/05/04
I hope it is a step in the right direction but.......  nite_w0lf | 03/05/04
steps  richhayes | 03/06/04
Don't get your hopes up just yet...  Jose Jimenez | 03/05/04
my hopes haven't changed  pschroeder@... | 03/06/04
It's not 4 million  openMind | 03/08/04
not quite...  ryusen | 03/08/04
apples vs. oranges  pschroeder@... | 03/08/04
whoops, sorry ...  pschroeder@... | 03/08/04
nog (nt)  ryusen | 03/08/04
Yes. As long it is not the last step in the same direction  David Mohring | 03/05/04
invention not discovery??  bjornafreeman@... | 03/06/04
Discovery Vs Invention  David Mohring | 03/08/04
No way ...  Ardian Daka | 03/08/04
Software patents  openMind | 03/08/04
Hardware patents?  dg mh | 03/08/04
Firmware  voska | 03/08/04
I can't agree more  openMind | 03/08/04
software patents  pschroeder@... | 03/08/04
Good  d_jedi | 03/05/04
As long as ....  systemcleaner | 03/05/04
As long as....  seosamh_z | 03/06/04
Corrections needed.  systemcleaner | 03/06/04
Waaayyyy off  d_jedi | 03/06/04
Conflict of Logic  middle of nowhere | 03/07/04
re:  pschroeder@... | 03/06/04
Not surprising.  systemcleaner | 03/06/04
wrong wrong wrong (as usual)  pschroeder@... | 03/06/04
Yes, for MS fans it is always MS is right. Everybody else is wrong.  systemcleaner | 03/06/04
SS, everything is NOT about MS, no matter how you want to paint it  pschroeder@... | 03/06/04
Wow! Schroeder you are higher than the President!  systemcleaner | 03/07/04
Government Offices  richhayes | 03/07/04
Oh please...  Patrick Jones | 03/06/04
re:  ryusen | 03/08/04
Not Not Surprising  dposkie@... | 03/10/04
you know...  ryusen | 03/08/04
You ignore the fact that  jfrankcarr | 03/06/04
Bush, the Republicans & Microsoft  bjornafreeman@... | 03/06/04
So, by your reckoning...  Confused by religion | 03/06/04
OK not all leftist  bjornafreeman@... | 03/06/04
Aids research funding is mostly in Africa...  Confused by religion | 03/07/04
Oh Puhleeeze  Squawkbox | 03/07/04
Message has been deleted.  qwwq | 03/07/04
some common sense  dg mh | 03/08/04
MS was RIGHT to start with Eolas was wrong  idnew2011@... | 03/08/04
not about MS  pschroeder@... | 03/08/04
Ha ha on Eolas  FilledOut | 03/08/04
Eolas was BOGUS to begin with  idnew2025@... | 03/08/04
In defense of Eolas  jlee88 | 03/09/04
You're wrong  eLurker | 03/09/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here